Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  1561 / 1708 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 1561 / 1708 Next Page
Page Background

M. Reni et al. / Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology 63 (2007) 81–89

87

7. Late sequelae

7.1. Long term sequelae

Cognitive and focal neurological deficits may have a great

impact on long term survivors of brain tumours, regardless

of the histology and grade of the tumour. Memory loss, apa-

thy, concentration difficulties and personality changes may

have a profound effect, even in those patients who appear to

have a Karnofsky performance status of 90 or 100. Surgery in

the so-called silent areas may contribute to cognitive deficits.

Less clear are the late effects of radiation therapy on cog-

nitive function. Radiotherapy is known to cause the early

somnolence syndrome, but may also cause late sequelae,

in particular delayed leuko-encephalopathy with cognitive

dysfunction and radiation necrosis

[95–97] .

In individual

patients, it is difficult however to entangle the direct effects

of the tumour on cognition from late effects of treatment. A

recent survey on cognitive deficits in progression free sur-

vivors of low-grade glioma failed to confirm the generally

assumed untoward relation between radiotherapy and cogni-

tive deficits

[98] . O

nly in those patients who had been treated

with fraction of 2 Gy or more, evidence of increased cognitive

dysfunction has been observed. The only other associa-

tion with cognitive deficits was treatment with anti-epileptic

drugs. Prior studies have suggested that whole brain radio-

therapy may be associated with more cognitive deficits than

involved field irradiation, although today involved field radio-

therapy is standard practice

[99] . R

adiation therapy may also

affect cranial nerves, or induce endocrine dysfunction even

in case of tumours distant from the hypothalamus-pituitary

region

[100] . S

eizures may have a great impact on the quality

of life even in patients with well-controlled tumours. Newer

anti-epileptic drugs may have less side-effects and should

be considered, especially in those patients using a multi-drug

regimen. Apart from cognitive deficits, a risk of death of 2.5%

at 2 years has been reported for doses of 50.4 Gy. A risk of

radionecrosis up to 5% at 5 years may occur after 60 Gy to

one third, or 50 Gy to two thirds of the brain volume, and with

50–53 Gy to brain stem with a similar risk for blindness after

50 Gy to the optic chiasm. Also chemotherapy may induce

late sequelae such as lymphoma, leukemia or solid tumours,

as well as lung fibrosis, infertility, renal failure, and signs of

neurotoxicity of the peripheral nervous system.

8. Follow-up

8.1. Follow up

No general guidelines for the follow-up of

ependymomas

can be given, these should be tailored to the individual patient

and taking into account tumour grade, previously adminis-

tered treatment and independent prognostic factors as age and

the functional status of the patient. Low-grade glioma patients

should be followed, even with stable lesion since many years.

At some point in time, progression will inevitably occur and

treatment should be installed before irreversible deficits has

developed.

Acknowledgment

The authors thank the members of the EUROCAREWork-

ing Group for permitting the relative survival analysis from

the EUROCARE dataset.

References

[1] Oppenheim JS, Strauss RC, Mormino J, et al. Ependymomas of the

third ventricle. Neurosurgery 1994;34:350–2.

[2] Centeno RS, Lee AA, Winter J, Barba D. Supratentorial ependymo-

mas. Neuroimaging and clinicopathological correlation. J Neurosurg

1986;64:209–15.

[3] ENCR. European Network of Cancer Registries. Eurocim version 4.0.

European incidence database V2.2 (1999). Lyon; 2001.

[4] Parkin DM, Kramarova E, Draper JG, et al. International incidence of

childhood cancer, vol. II. Lyon: IARC Scientific Pub. No. 144; 1998.

[5] Berrino F, Capocaccia R, Coleman MP, et al. Survival of cancer

patients in Europe: the EUROCARE-3 study. Ann Oncol 2003; 14

Suppl 5.

[6] Gatta G, Corazziari I, Magnani C, et al. Childhood cancer survival in

Europe. Ann Oncol 2003;14(Suppl 5):v119–27.

[7] Bergsagel DJ, Finegold MJ, Butel JS, et al. DNA sequences similar to

those of simian virus 40 in ependymomas and choroid plexus tumors

of childhood. N Engl J Med 1992;326:988–93.

[8] Lednicky JA, Garcea RL, Bergsagel DJ, Butel JS. Natural simian

virus 40 strains are present in human choroid plexus and ependymoma

tumors. Virology 1995;212:710–7.

[9] Engels EA, Katki HA, Nielsen NM, et al. Cancer incidence in Den-

mark following exposure to poliovirus vaccine contaminated with

simian virus 40. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003;95:532–9.

[10] Strickler HD, Rosenberg PS, Devesa SS, et al. Contamination of

poliovirus vaccines with simian virus 40 (1955–1963) and subsequent

cancer rates. JAMA 1998;279:292–5.

[11] Preston-Martin S, Mack S. Neoplasms of the nervous system. In:

Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF, editors. Cancer epidemiology and pre-

vention. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996. p. 1213–81.

[12] Little J. Epidemiology of childhood cancer. Lyon: IARC Scient. Publ

No. 149; 1999.

[13] Bunin GR, Kuijten RR, Buckley JD, et al. Relation between maternal

diet and subsequent primitive neuroectodermal brain tumors in young

children. N Engl J Med 1993;329:536–41.

[14] Wiestler OD, Schiffer D, Coons SW, et al. Ependymal tumours. In:

Kleihues P, Cavenee WC, editors. World Health Organization Classi-

fication of Tumours. Pathology and Genetics. Tumours of the Nervous

System, 2000, p. 71–81.

[15] Schiffer D, Giordana MT. Prognosis of ependymoma. Childs Nerv

Syst 1998;14:357–61.

[16] Kimura T, Budka H, Soler-Federsppiel S. An immunocytochemical

comparison of the glia-associated proteins glial fibrillary acidic pro-

tein (GFAP) and S-100 protein (S100P) in human brain tumors. Clin

Neuropathol 1986;5:21–7.

[17] Tabuchi K, Moriya Y, Furuta T, et al. S-100 protein in human glial

tumours. Qualitative and quantitative studies. Acta Neurochir (Wien)

1982;65:239–51.

[18] Mannoji H, Becker LE. Ependymal and choroid plexus tumors.

Cytokeratin and GFAP expression. Cancer 1988;61:1377–85.

[19] Lamszus K, Lachenmayer L, Heinemann U, et al. Molecular genetic

alterations on chromosomes 11 and 22 in ependymomas. Int J Cancer

2001;91:803–8.