Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  1559 / 1708 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 1559 / 1708 Next Page
Page Background

M. Reni et al. / Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology 63 (2007) 81–89

85

may have a somewhat better prognosis with 5-year survivals

of 55–90% as compared to paediatric patients, i.e.14–60%

[38,39,46,52,58] . I

n general, the younger the child the worse

the prognosis

[38,45,47,53] . I

t has been suggested that paedi-

atric ependymomas may behave more aggressively, based on

the more immature neural tissue of the children

[38,58] . D

if-

ferent patterns in cytogenetic aberrations between younger

and older patients may underlie the age-related outcome

[32] .

The role of tumour location is also controversial. If spinal

lesions are related to the most favourable outcome, things are

less clear for intracranial tumours. Some authors reported no

prognostic impact of this variable

[37,39,49,54,55] .

Accord-

ing to others, supratentorial ependymomas are related to a

worse prognosis because they more often exhibit periph-

eral infiltrative growth into the brain parenchyma and are

less often entirely encapsulated rendering surgical resectabil-

ity troublesome

[33,34,38,46,59] . F

urthermore, infratentorial

tumours show a lower mitotic activity than supratentorial

tumours

[60,61] .

Conversely, other authors claimed a worse

prognosis for ependymomas arising from the posterior fossa,

which occur in younger patients

[45] a

nd invade the brain-

stem, the floor of the fourth ventricle or cranial nerves of

the cerebellopontine angle through the foramen of Luschka,

precluding complete resection

[38,53] .

The 5-year survival

ranges between 35% and 76% for supratentorial, 40% and

59% for infratentorial, and 57% and 100% for spinal ependy-

momas

[33,39,46,49,62] .

The extent of resection has been

proposed as an independent prognostic factor. Gross total

resection achieves a better 5-year survival than a subtotal

removal or biopsy

[52,63,64] .

In some cases, the benefit of

complete resection was limited to low-grade tumours

[55] .

However, most authors failed to find any significant survival

advantage related to the extent of resection

[34,38,49,53,57] .

The lack of evidence for the impact of surgery on survival

could be related to the unreliability of subjective assess-

ment of the degree of surgical ablation

[65] .

By contrast, the

degree of resection, when assessed by postoperative imaging,

revealed a significant difference in 5-year freedom from pro-

gressive disease in a small series of 19 patients

[65] .

Female

gender was reported to show better survival than male gender

in one single series

[55] .

6. Treatment

6.1. Surgery

Surgery represents the standard treatment for ependy-

moma; it provides tissue for histologic diagnosis, may

re-establish cerebrospinal fluid flow, and permits debulking

or total resection of the tumour. Maximal surgical resec-

tion can be of paramount importance and should be carried

out whenever possible, without compromising neurological

function, and a positive relation between extent of imaging-

based surgical resection and outcome has been suggested

[65] .

Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging allows a

better evaluation of the degree of resection and may also iden-

tify cases in whom immediate second-look surgery might

be useful. Significant improvements in neurosurgical tech-

niques and neuro-anesthesia have facilitated a reduction

of operative mortality of 25–50% for infratentorial and of

6–22% for supratentorial ependymomas to less than 5% of

cases

[38,47,52,56] .

Incomplete resection is the rule because

ependymomas usually grow in highly specialised areas of the

central nervous system. The frequency of complete resections

is higher in surgical series than in radiotherapy series and

ranges from 25% to 93% for supratentorial ependymomas

[33,39,66,67] a

nd from 5% to 72% for infratentorial ependy-

momas

[33,38,39,44,46,49,52,54,67] . T

he rate of gross total

resections in infratentorial tumours depends on their location,

being up to 100% in the roof of the fourth ventricle, 86% in

mid-floor tumours and 54% in the lateral recesses

[52] . S

pinal

cord tumours, which in the majority are low-grade lesions,

can often completely be removed, and without functional

sacrifice in 27–45% of cases

[33,34,46,47,49,68–70] .

6.2. Radiation therapy

Postoperative radiotherapy (RT) is the standard treatment

on a type C basis in high-grade ependymomas, and on a type

3 basis in low-grade ependymomas. Five-year survival rates

for patients with intracranial ependymomas have increased

from 0–27%

[71] to

36.5–87% since the use of systemic irra-

diation

[25,34,39,46,47,54–56,62,63,67,68,70,72–74] . H

ow-

ever, data on survival after surgery alone are limited inmodern

series and a clear impact of radiotherapy on the outcome is

not supported by consistent statistical data because no ran-

domised trials have been carried out. The non-significant

prolonged survival with postoperative irradiation as observed

in retrospective series was either uncontrolled or compared

with historical controls

[45,54,72] w

hile in the single series

reporting a significant benefit, the comparison was biased

due to inclusion of patients experiencing progressive dis-

ease during postoperative chemotherapy, or patients younger

than 3 years of age in the control arm

[63] .

Notwithstand-

ing these considerations, particularly since failure to control

local disease remains the most significant factor contribut-

ing to recurrence and a poor survival, there is a consensus

that radiotherapy should be part in the standard of care

for the majority of patients. More recently, some small

series reported a remarkably good outcome in children with

low-grade intracranial ependymoma and did not receive irra-

diation after a gross total resection

[45,65–68,70,73,75,76] .

The option of a close observation and delaying radiation

until signs of tumour progression may be relevant, since late

effects as cognitive deterioration, endocrine dysfunction in

small children or dementia in the elderly constitute major

concerns in patients who are potential long-term survivors of

brain tumours. So, reserving RT for relapses appears to be an

attractive strategy in these patients. It may also be considered

as a therapeutic option for patients with a subtotal resection

of low-grade ependymomas, assuming that the behaviour of