![Show Menu](styles/mobile-menu.png)
![Page Background](./../common/page-substrates/page0240.jpg)
GAZETTE
M E D I A
W A T C H
AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 1996
Lawyers as well as the law
targeted in anti-crime backlash
The overwhelming sense of public
shock and outrage which followed the
murder in Limerick on 7 June 1996 of
Detective Garda
Jerry McCabe
and, in
particular, the cold-blooded
assassination of investigative
journalist
Veronica Guerin
on 26th
June 1996, have created an absolute
political necessity for 'something to be
done' about the godfathers of crime
who had supposedly moved beyond
the reach of the law.
A package of legislative measures,
unprecedented both in its range and
speed of introduction, has been the
Government response. The publicly
stated position of the Law Society and
of others in the legal profession has
been one of full support for any
reasonable measures, legislative or
otherwise, which will assist in fighting
the social evil of drug-related crime.
However, as the Law Society made
clear earlier this year in its opposition
to the introduction of new powers of
seven-day detention without charge of
drug trafficking suspects, there are
grave dangers in legislative measures
which erode civil liberties and
traditional rights of accused persons.
This message, that it is the task of the
criminal law not merely to convict the
guilty but most preciously and
essentially also to ensure the acquittal
of the innocent, has lacked populist
appeal in the atmosphere which has
prevailed in recent times. Indeed, in
some quarters both in politics and the
media there has been an unfortunate
inclination to criticise not merely the
criminal law but also lawyers
themselves.
In the
Sunday Independent
recently,
Tony Gregory,
TD, said, "All of the
main drug dealers have solicitors and
accountants advising them on how to
make their money anonymous. Those 1
know in my area have little education
and would not be of an extraordinarily
high IQ. They don't have expertise, but
they have the money to buy it".
Tony Gregory, TD - Solicitors dealing in
"blood money".
Mr. Gregory was highly critical of the
legal profession. He expressed the belief
that certain solicitors were exploiting the
situation and were, in fact, dealing in
"blood money".
Mr. Gregory added, "I have no doubt
that solicitors are getting a substantial
financial settlement for getting these
people off'.
In response, in the same article, the
Director General of the Law Society,
Ken Murphy,
said - "If Mr. Gregory has
any evidence that solicitors are engaged
in illegal activity, he should bring it
immediately to the Gardaf'.
Mr. Murphy said the Law Society would
support the fullrigors of the law being
brought to bear against a solicitor in
such a case. "However, the Law Society
has no such evidence and believes that
care should be taken in the current
climate to ensure against unsubstantiated
and unfair claims being made which can
damage the reputation of individuals and
groups in society", he said.
In another edition of the
Sunday
Independent,
journalist Declan Lynch
suggested that defence counsel were
"soulmates" with the criminal and that
they "reaped the profits".
In response, the Chairman of the Bar
Council,
James Nugent,
said that
suggestions that barristers who defend
accused persons should be condemned
for complicity were "ill-informed,
misjudged and dangerous at any time,
but particularly in the present climate of
understandable fear and confusion which
prevails among the general public".
Mr. Nugent continued, "It is a sad and
frightening reflection of the tone of the
present debate that it appears necessary
to point out that a barrister who acts to
defend an accused person cannot and
must not be interpreted as any indication
that the barrister condones, approves,
aids or abets anything which their client
is accused of doing".
•
AN BORD PINSEAN -
J
THE PENSIONS BOARP
GUIDANCE NOTES
on
"WHISTLEBLOWING"
The P e n s i o ns Board has i s s u ed
Guidance
Notes
on f o ot of the
P e n s i o ns ( Am e n dm e n t) Act, 1996
which came into effect from 2 July
and which includes new statutory pro-
visions dealing with compulsory and
voluntary reporting to the Pensions
Board.
The
Guidance
Notes
are intended to
provide assistance to those involved in
the operation of pension schemes who
may be c o v e r ed by the mandatory
reporting requirements, and also to
pension practitioners and members of
the public who may be considering
making a voluntary report.
C o p i es of the
Guidance
Notes
are
available by subscription and may be
ordered from the:
Information Section,
The Pensions Board,
Holies Street, Dublin 2.
Tel: No. (01) 6762622
Fax: No. (01) 6764714
229