Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  116 / 120 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 116 / 120 Next Page
Page Background www.read-tpt.com

114

S

EPTEMBER

2016

AR T I C L E

Advanced Machine & Engineering/AMSAW

by Willy Goellner, chairman and founder – Advanced Machine & Engineering/AMSAW

Finite element modal analysis

Calculation using Kirchhoff plate theory

Experimental modal analysis (impact test)

You hit the blade with an

impact hammer.

Accelerometers will track

the transfer function

with the help of a data

acquisition device (DAQ).

Hint: In cas you do ’t

have a DAQ available,

you can also use an

oscilloscope and do the

signal transformation

(Fast Fourier

Transformation) in Excel.

As a result, you can

see the lowest natural

frequency, for example at

23Hz in the chart below.

The equations that arise from the modal analysis are

the same that can be found when solving eigenvalue

problems.

1) Every eigenvalue (natural frequency) has a

corresponding eigenvector (mode shape).

2) The benefit when using FEA is that you do not only

get the frequency value, but you can visualise the

mode shape easily.

3) The end result is very close to the measurement of

23Hz.

4) This mode, which is represented by node diameter 2

and node circle 0, is one which causes most damage

to the teeth.

Last but not least, you calculate the natural frequency of the blade and get a feeling for the driving parameters. If you use

Kirchhoff plate theory in polar coordinates, and replace the static load with negative mass acceleration, by solving the

Bessel differential equation you will end up with the following formula for the natural frequency

f

1

.

1) Calculate the flexural rigidity, K

K

=

E

*

t

3

= 2.1 * 10

11

* (5.5 * 10

-3

)

3

= 3,267 Nm

12 * (1–

ν

2

) 12 * (1–0.33

2

)

2) Calculate the natural frequency

f

1

=

λ

1

2

*

K

=

5.253

*

K

= 23Hz

2

π *

(

D/

2)

2

ρ

* t

2

π *

2

7,900 * 0.0055

Substituting the equation for K into the equation for

f

1

leads to

f

1

=

ξ

1

t E

D

2

ρ

ξ is a combined factor which is dependent on the boundary condition, the mode you are looking for, and other constants.

This shows how theory can prove practical testing and explains that the natural frequency increases linearly with the

thickness (

t

) and decreases by the square of the diameter (

D

), as the short formula for

f

1

shows.

λ

2

= tabulated value for the

boundary condition and mode

D

= Diameter

(1,120mm)

t

= Thickness

(5.5mm)

E

= Young’s modulus of steel

ν

= Poisson’s ratio

for steel

ρ = Density for

steel

1.120

2