Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  540 / 1195 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 540 / 1195 Next Page
Page Background

Test Portion Distribution

1

2

All samples were labeled with a randomized, blind-coded 3 digit number affixed to the

3

sample container. Test portions were shipped on a Thursday via overnight delivery according to

4

the Category B Dangerous Goods shipment regulations set forth by IATA. Upon receipt,

5

samples were held by the collaborating laboratory at refrigeration temperature (3-5 °C) until the

6

following Monday when analysis was initiated. All samples were packed with cold packs to

7

target a temperature of < 7°C during shipment. In addition to each of the test portions and the

8

total plate count replicate, collaborators also received a test portion for each matrix labeled as

9

‘temperature control’. Participants were instructed to obtain the temperature of this portion upon

10

receipt of the package, document results on the Sample Receipt Confirmation form provided and

11

faxed to the study director.

12

13

Test Portion Analysis

14

15

Collaborators followed the appropriate preparation and analysis protocol according to the

16

method for each test portion size. For both test portion sizes, each collaborator received 72 test

17

portions of each food product (12 high, 12 low and 12 controls for each evaluation). For the

18

analysis of the 25g test portions by the VIDAS LPTmethod, a 25 gsample replicatewasenriched

19

with 225 mL of pre-warmed (18-25

o

C) LPT broth and homogenized for 2 minutes. Test portions

20

were incubated for 26-30 hours at 30 ±1

o

C. For the 125 g test potions analyzed by the VIDAS

21

LPTmethod, a125g sample replicate was enriched with 375mL pre-warmed (18-25

o

C) LPT broth

22

andhomogenized for 2 minutes. Test portions were incubated for 24-30hours at

23

30 ±1

o

C. For 125 g test potions, a 1.0 mL aliquot of the primary enrichment was transferred into

24

10 mL LPT broth and incubated for an additional 22-26 hours at 30 ± 1

o

C.

25

Following enrichment, samples were assayed by the VIDAS LPT method and confirmed

26

following procedures outlined in the standard reference method by streaking an aliquot of the

27

primary enrichment onto Oxford Agar (OXA) and a proprietary chromogenic agar, ALOA.

28

Presumptive positive samples were streaked for isolation on TSA/ye and biochemically

29

confirmed by morphology verification via Gram stain, hemolysis test and by VITEK 2 GP

30

Biochemical Identification method (AOAC OMA 2012.02) or API Listeria biochemical test kits.

31

Laboratories utilizing API Listeria kits were also required to conduct a catalase test and an

32

oxidase test.

33

Both test portion sizes analyzed by the VIDAS LPTmethods were compared to samples

34

(25 g) analyzed using the AOAC 993.12 reference method in conjunction with VITEK 2 GP

35

Biochemical Identification (OMA 2012.02) or API

Listeria

(1) for the confirmation of

Listeria

in

36

an unpaired study design. Twenty-five gram testportions were enriched in pre-warmed (45

o

C)

37

selective enrichment broth, homogenized for 2 minutes and incubated at 30 ± 2

o

C for 48 hours.

38

Samples were streaked onto OXA and presumptive positive samples were streaked for isolation

39

onto TSA/ye. Colonies from TSA/ye were confirmedby morphology verificationvia Gram stain,

40

hemolysis test and by VITEK 2 GPBiochemical Identification methodor API Listeria

41

biochemical test kits. Laboratories utilizing API Listeria kits were also required to conduct a

42

catalase test and an oxidase test.

43

44

Statistical Analysis

45

46

Each collaborating laboratory recorded results for the reference method andVIDASLPT

47

results. The data sheets were submitted to the study director at the end of each week of testing

48

for analysis. The results of each test portion for each sample were compiled by the study director

49

4