Test Portion Distribution
1
2
All samples were labeled with a randomized, blind-coded 3 digit number affixed to the
3
sample container. Test portions were shipped on a Thursday via overnight delivery according to
4
the Category B Dangerous Goods shipment regulations set forth by IATA. Upon receipt,
5
samples were held by the collaborating laboratory at refrigeration temperature (3-5 °C) until the
6
following Monday when analysis was initiated. All samples were packed with cold packs to
7
target a temperature of < 7°C during shipment. In addition to each of the test portions and the
8
total plate count replicate, collaborators also received a test portion for each matrix labeled as
9
‘temperature control’. Participants were instructed to obtain the temperature of this portion upon
10
receipt of the package, document results on the Sample Receipt Confirmation form provided and
11
faxed to the study director.
12
13
Test Portion Analysis
14
15
Collaborators followed the appropriate preparation and analysis protocol according to the
16
method for each test portion size. For both test portion sizes, each collaborator received 72 test
17
portions of each food product (12 high, 12 low and 12 controls for each evaluation). For the
18
analysis of the 25g test portions by the VIDAS LPTmethod, a 25 gsample replicatewasenriched
19
with 225 mL of pre-warmed (18-25
o
C) LPT broth and homogenized for 2 minutes. Test portions
20
were incubated for 26-30 hours at 30 ±1
o
C. For the 125 g test potions analyzed by the VIDAS
21
LPTmethod, a125g sample replicate was enriched with 375mL pre-warmed (18-25
o
C) LPT broth
22
andhomogenized for 2 minutes. Test portions were incubated for 24-30hours at
23
30 ±1
o
C. For 125 g test potions, a 1.0 mL aliquot of the primary enrichment was transferred into
24
10 mL LPT broth and incubated for an additional 22-26 hours at 30 ± 1
o
C.
25
Following enrichment, samples were assayed by the VIDAS LPT method and confirmed
26
following procedures outlined in the standard reference method by streaking an aliquot of the
27
primary enrichment onto Oxford Agar (OXA) and a proprietary chromogenic agar, ALOA.
28
Presumptive positive samples were streaked for isolation on TSA/ye and biochemically
29
confirmed by morphology verification via Gram stain, hemolysis test and by VITEK 2 GP
30
Biochemical Identification method (AOAC OMA 2012.02) or API Listeria biochemical test kits.
31
Laboratories utilizing API Listeria kits were also required to conduct a catalase test and an
32
oxidase test.
33
Both test portion sizes analyzed by the VIDAS LPTmethods were compared to samples
34
(25 g) analyzed using the AOAC 993.12 reference method in conjunction with VITEK 2 GP
35
Biochemical Identification (OMA 2012.02) or API
Listeria
(1) for the confirmation of
Listeria
in
36
an unpaired study design. Twenty-five gram testportions were enriched in pre-warmed (45
o
C)
37
selective enrichment broth, homogenized for 2 minutes and incubated at 30 ± 2
o
C for 48 hours.
38
Samples were streaked onto OXA and presumptive positive samples were streaked for isolation
39
onto TSA/ye. Colonies from TSA/ye were confirmedby morphology verificationvia Gram stain,
40
hemolysis test and by VITEK 2 GPBiochemical Identification methodor API Listeria
41
biochemical test kits. Laboratories utilizing API Listeria kits were also required to conduct a
42
catalase test and an oxidase test.
43
44
Statistical Analysis
45
46
Each collaborating laboratory recorded results for the reference method andVIDASLPT
47
results. The data sheets were submitted to the study director at the end of each week of testing
48
for analysis. The results of each test portion for each sample were compiled by the study director
49
4