Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  79 / 1195 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 79 / 1195 Next Page
Page Background

DuPont™ BAX

®

System Real-Time PCR Assay for

Salmonella

: Collaborative Study

DuPont Nutrition & Health

Page 1

Detection of

Salmonella

species in a Variety of Foods by the

1

DuPont™ BAX

®

System Real-Time PCR Assay for

Salmonella

:

2

Collaborative Study

3

Authors

4

F. Morgan Wallace, Bridget Andaloro, Dawn Fallon, Nisha Corrigan, Stephen Varkey, Daniel DeMarco,

5

Andrew Farnum, Monica Tadler, Steven Hoelzer, Julie Weller, Eugene Davis, Jeffrey Rohrbeck and

6

George Tice

7

DuPont Nutrition & Health, ESL Building 400, Route 141 & Henry Clay Road, Wilmington, Delaware

8

19880

9

Patrick Bird, Erin Crowley, Jonathan Flannery, Kiel Fisher, Travis Huffman, Megan Boyle, M. Joseph

10

Benzinger, Jr., Paige Bedinghaus, Katie Goetz, William Judd, Jim Agin and David Goins

11

Q Laboratories, Inc., 1400 Harrison Avenue, Cincinnati, Ohio 45214

12

Collaborators

13

D. Clark; B. Dieckelman; T. Donohue; H. Elgaali; W. Fedio; E. Galbraith; B. Kupski; K. McCallum; G.

14

McWhorter; J. Meyer; D. Swift; R. Radcliff; D. Rodgers; M. Steele; L. Thompson

15

16

A multi-laboratory study was conducted to evaluate the ability of the DuPont™ BAX® System Real-

17

Time PCR Assay for

Salmonella

to detect the target species in a variety of foods and environmental

18

surfaces. Internal validation studies were performed by DuPont Nutrition & Health on 24 different

19

sample types to demonstrate the reliability of the test method among a wide variety of sample types.

20

Two of these matrices – pork and turkey frankfurters and pasteurized, not-from-concentrate orange

21

juice without pulp – were each evaluated in 14 independent laboratories as part of the collaborative

22

study to demonstrate repeatability of the internal laboratory results independent of the end user.

23

Frankfurter samples were evaluated against the USDA-FSIS reference method as a paired study, while

24

orange juice samples were evaluated against the FDA-BAM reference method as an unpaired study,

25

using a proprietary media for the test method.

26

All samples tested in this study were artificially inoculated with a

Salmonella

strain at levels expected

27

to produce low (0.2–2.0 cfu/test portion) or high (5 cfu/test portion) spike levels on the day of

28

analysis. For each matrix, the collaborative study failed to show a statistically significant difference

29

between the candidate method and the reference method using the POD model.

30

31

FINAL (Version 4)