Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  74 / 1195 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 74 / 1195 Next Page
Page Background

N/A

Reviewer 9 (McMahon):

N/A

III.

RECOMMENDATION:

a.

Do you recommend that the ERP adopt this method as an AOAC

Official Methods of

Analysis (First Action status)

?

Reviewer 1 (Achen):

Yes.

Reviewer 2 (Douey):

If concerns, suggestions above are addressed, then yes, I would recommend the ERP adopt

this method as an AOAC Official Method of Analysis (First Action Status).

Reviewer 3 (Hitchins):

Yes, I recommend First Action Status.

Reviewer 4 (Brodsky):

Yes.

Reviewer 5 (Hammack):

Yes, but not unless the OMA method includes the corrections that I have indicated above.

In short, sections D and G should be updated, as I indicated above, and there should be a

reference section in the method.

Reviewer 6 (Hayes):

N/A

Reviewer 7 (Fernandez):

Yes

Reviewer 8 (Chen):

Yes

Reviewer 9 (McMahon):

Yes

IV.

AFTER FIRST ACTION STATUS:

a.

Is there any additional information that the ERP should consider in order to recommend

the method for Final Action status?

Reviewer 1 (Achen):

Not applicable.