72 / 1195
The Statistic’s Advisor’s review was not available to this reviewer. An RLOD result was
projected in the collaborative study protocol. It is not mentioned in this collaborative study
manuscript. However, its absence is not critical. The demonstrated equivalence of the test
method with the two reference methods is sufficient.
Reviewer 4 (Brodsky):
None.
Reviewer 5 (Hammack):
No comments.
Reviewer 6 (Hayes):
N/A
Reviewer 7 (Fernandez):
No
Reviewer 8 (Chen):
No
Reviewer 9 (McMahon):
N/A
h.
Comments:
Reviewer 1 (Achen):
None.
Reviewer 2 (Douey):
In general, the studies were well done, with demonstration that the alternate BAX method
would be considered equivalent to the reference methods used.
Reviewer 3 (Hitchins):
Fourteen laboratories out of 15 provided valid data on each matrix in the partial recovery
region.
Reviewer 4 (Brodsky):
None.
Reviewer 5 (Hammack):
No comments.
Reviewer 6 (Hayes):
N/A
Reviewer 7 (Fernandez):