Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  879 / 1195 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 879 / 1195 Next Page
Page Background

Difference of Probabilities of Detection (dPOD)

.—

Difference of probabilities of

170

detection is the difference between any two POD values.

171

Estimate the dPOD

CP

as the difference between the candidate presumptive result

172

POD (POD

CP

) and the candidate confirmed result POD (POD

CC

) values. The 95%

173

confidence interval on the dPOD

CP

was calculated.

174

175

dPOD

CP

= POD

CP

- POD

CC

176

177

Estimate the dPOD

C

as the difference between the candidate method and

178

reference method POD values. The 95% confidence interval on the dPOD

C

was

179

calculated.

180

181

dPOD

C

= POD

C

– POD

R

182

183

If the confidence interval of a dPOD does not contain zero, then the difference is

184

statistically significant at the 5% level.

185

Results

186

187

The food matrices used, ground beef, queso fresco, deli ham and turkey had low

188

bacterial counts (Table 1). All the samples were screened negative for

Listeria

spp.

189

and

Listeria monocytogenes

. All the food matrices were inoculated with different

190

strains of L.

monocytogenes

(Table 1) to get fractional positives at low inoculation

191

level (0.2-2 CFU/test portion). Additionally, 5 samples were inoculated with high

192

levels of inoculums and 5 were not inoculated (Table 1).

193

Ground Beef: The LMX successfully detected 7 positives out of 25 samples which

194

were confirmed by the USDA method without any false negatives or false positives

195

(POD 0.28; CI 0.14-0.48) (Table 2, 3). Similarly, the USDA reference method was

196

able to detect 7 positives of the 25 samples. The test method was equivalent to the

197

USDA method (dPOD=0; CI -0.24-0.24; chi sq. 0) (Table 3) in detecting

L.

198

monocytogenes

in ground beef.

199

Queso Fresco: Queso fresco enrichments had 11 positives out of 25 low

200

inoculated samples. The LMX successfully detected 11 positives out of 25 samples

201

which were confirmed by the AOAC method without any false negatives or false

202

positives (POD 0.44; CI 0.27-0.63) (Table 2, 3). Similarly, the AOAC reference

203

method was able to detect 11 positives of the 25 samples. The test method was

204

equivalent to the AOAC method (dPOD=0; CI -0.26-0.26, chi sq. 0) (Table 3) in

205

detecting

L. monocytogenes

in queso fresco (Mexican soft-cheese).

206

Deli Ham: Deli ham enrichments had 16 positives out of 25 low inoculated

207

samples. The LMX successfully detected 16 positives out of 25 samples which

208

were confirmed by the USDA method without any false negatives or false positives

209

PTM Certification Modification Report