Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  938-939 / 1195 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 938-939 / 1195 Next Page
Page Background

24

1

Table 11. Heat-stress Injury for GovVal study

2

3

4

5

Analysis of data for all of the Method Comparison Studies

6

7

Fractionally positive data (5-15 positives) by at least one method, the LMX or reference method was required for analysis. The data

8

was analysed according to current AOAC guidelines. Comparison of data for the LMX method and the Reference method using Chi-

9

square test at the 5% level was conducted for unpaired data (Mantel-Haenszel test). The chi-square analysis must show that there was

10

no significant difference between the 2 methods at the 5% level or that the LMX method was significantly better than the Reference

11

method.

12

13

Discussion of results

14

15

PTM Study:

16

17

Processed cheese

18

For processed cheese inoculated with

L.monocytogenes

(unpaired enrichments) there were 5 confirmed positives for both the LMX

19

and AOAC methods. All uninoculated samples were negative with both methods. There were no false positives for the VIDAS

20

method for uninoculated samples. Confirmation using OAA or ChromID Lmono media showed exact agreement with traditional

21

media. There was no significant difference between the LMX method and the reference method using unpaired Chi-square test (Table

22

12)

23

Test Organism

Matrix

CFU/OXA

CFU/BHI

Degree Injury

L. monocytogenes

1/2a

ATCC 49594

Liver paté

2.4 x 10

8

1.1 x 10

9

78 %

L. monocytogenes

1/2b

ATCC BAA-751

Hot dogs

4.4 x 10

8

1.5 x 10

9

71 %

L. monocytogenes

3b

CWD 1591

Fermented

sausage

3.8 x 10

8

1.2 x 10

9

68 %

L. monocytogenes

3c

FSL-J1-049

Sliced deli turkey

6.6 x 10

8

1.5 x 10

9

56 %

L. monocytogenes

4b

ATCC 19115

Sliced deli ham

7.2 x 10

8

1.8 x 10

9

60 %

L. innocua

ATCC 33091

Hot dogs

3.5 x 10

8

9.4 x 10

8

63 %

PTM Certification Report