965 / 1195
Eurofins IPL Nord SAS – 1 rue du professeur Calmette – 59046 LILLE cedex
10 / 15
VIDAS LMX – Summary 2012 v01
3.3 Results
3.3.1 Results obtained by cooperating laboratories
The detailed results are presented in appendix D and the following tables give a summary for all the laboratories.
Positive results obtained with the reference method
Levels of contamination
Laboratory
L0
L1
L2
Positive results
Total samples
Positive results
Total samples Positive results Total samples
A
0
8
8
8
8
8
B
0
8
8
8
8
8
C
0
8
8
8
8
8
D
0
8
8
8
8
8
E
0
8
8
8
8
8
G
0
8
8
8
8
8
H
0
8
8
8
8
8
I
0
8
8
8
8
8
K
0
8
8
8
7
8
L
0
8
8
8
8
8
M
0
8
8
8
8
8
N
0
8
8
8
8
8
Total
0
96
96
96
95
96
(a)
(b)
(c)
Positive results obtained with the alternative method
Levels of contamination
Laboratory
L0
L1
L2
Positive results
Total samples
Positive results
Total samples Positive results Total samples
A
0
8
8
8
8
8
B
0
8
8
8
8
8
C
0
8
8
8
8
8
D
0
8
8
8
8
8
E
0
8
8
8
8
8
G
0
8
8
8
8
8
H
0
8
8
8
4
8
I
0
8
8
8
8
8
K
0
8
8
8
7
8
L
0
8
8
8
8
8
M
0
8
8
8
8
8
N
0
8
8
8
8
8
Total
0
96
96
96
91
96
(a)
(b)
(c)
(a) : False positive
(b) : True positive at level 1
(c) : True positive at level 2
3.3.2 Conclusion with comments (discordances with expected results, exclusions… for
instance)
The results of the reference method and the alternative method are corresponding, and corresponding in the
expected results for 10 laboratories.
Tree laboratories are excluded from the performance of the results continuation in the conditions of reception of
samples (J, O and P). The laboratory F did not realize the tries.
Finally, the results of 12 laboratories can be performed.
3.4 Calculations
The results of 12 laboratories were considered.
Note : the positive results of the alternative method were all confirmed.