Previous Page  36 / 40 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 36 / 40 Next Page
Page Background

36

I

Nonprofit

Professional

Performance

Magazine

False Leadership

“We don’t have Time for Creativity.”

T

he idea that people don’t have time

for creativity is both laughable and

saddening. You don’t have time not to

seek creativity. Daily things can assist

in this growth. Design boards bring

together the things you find appealing, to see

how they might intersect in new and valuable

ways. For those less visually inclined, there is

the “commonplace” book. Before handheld

computers and smartphones, many brilliant

thinkers kept a book on hand and, when they

encountered an idea, a quote, etc., they would

write it in the commonplace book. Then

when they needed to come up with things,

there was a physical book to reference.

It doesn’t take much time to increase your

creativity with the visuals of a design board

or a commonplace book. I use Evernote to

dump anything intriguing. Ideas stem from a

pre-existing framework, so exposing yourself

to new ideas and saving them for future use

will provide you with the framework for

creativity.

False Archetypes

“I am not a Creative —They Are.”

This is one of the most dangerous statements

and biggest myths about creativity. It is

dangerous, from a leadership standpoint,

to think that only certain people have the

ability to generate ideas on demand. People

who think they are NOT part of that group

discount themselves and their ability to come

up with ideas. There is a confirmation bias

here: if you think you don’t have it,you won

’t.It

is also dangerous for those we call “creatives,”

because it says, “Never mind your skills and

talent and all of the work that you have put

in to become as good as you are, it came from

a certain ‘genetic code’ or something.” Thus,

it undermines the leader, the supposed “non-

creatives,” and the supposed “creatives.”

Every great groundbreaking innovation

stems from the combination of pre-existing

ideas. People tend to grow expertise in one

deep level area. However, creativity often

emerges for those taking a T-shaped path.

These individuals are deep in a specific area,

but cultivate knowledge and exposure across

a wider variety of exposed areas, giving a

more diverse and broader perspective to

utilize as the raw material for new ideas. It

simply involves talking to people you don’t

normally talk to, pursuing experiences you

don’t normally pursue, reading things you

don’t normally read, and learning things that

are out of your area of expertise. That isn’t

easy, but it is simple. We love doing what

we find comforting, which is what we have

always done.

False Framework

“We don’t have Room for Creativity and

Innovation. We are a Nonprofit.”

I encourage social benefit leaders to

examine Clayton Christensen’s The

Innovator’s Dilemma. This framework

that, because we are social benefit

organizations we don’t have room for

innovation, can be damaging. Too

often, we just assume that we should

continue the way things are, within the

comfort of sameness. Usually people

look at new opportunities and believe that

it makes more sense to maintain the present

course. It usually takes an “upstart” who is

ahead of the change curve to examine that

niche, engage it, and grow it exponentially.

Steve Jobs believed that the best way to move

forward was to cannibalize Apple to change

for growth. This functions the same way in

the nonprofit world (though you have to

stay true to your core mission and values).

Organizations that play around with new

concepts and ideas are more likely to thrive

than those that don’t.

There is a continuum between being reactive

and being planners. Wherever you are, take

a small step toward being reactive. There

is value in saying, “Here is where we are

going, but we are willing to be wrong.” As

we progress, if data contradicts our plan, we

can modify and change. Peter Sims calls this

“little bets.” The far end of the continuum,

at planning, is where we place a lot of little

bets. As we learn more about what works

(and doesn’t) we’ll move farther down the

continuum toward the reactive end.This gives

people the freedom to be wrong.That fear of

being wrong typically stands in the way of a

lot of people’s creative abilities. Most ideas

don’t come out fully formed.Most great ideas

start out terrible, but as you revise and react

to feedback, they get better and better. This

idea of little bets gives people permission

The Myth Buster

Recognizing the Creativity in All of Us!

david burkus