Background Image
Previous Page  58 / 552 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 58 / 552 Next Page
Page Background

INFORMS Philadelphia – 2015

56

2 - Impact of Top Service Designers on Experience

Service Performance

Gregory Heim, Associate Professor, Mays Business School at Texas

A&M University, Wehner Hall 320, College Station, TX, 77843-

4217, United States of America,

GHeim@mays.tamu.edu

Service firms today leverage many designers known for design excellence. Despite

expanding use of top designers, no research examines practical implications of top

designers as compared to mainstream designers. In considering whether to use

top designers, service managers must consider benefits from investment in high

quality designs. Using data on golf courses and golf course designers, we study

how top designers influence performance of Texas golf courses.

3 - Applying Normalized Systems Theory to Service System Design

Ralph Badinelli, Professor, Virginia Tech, Dept. of Busines

Information Technology, Virginia Tech 0235, Blacksburg, VA,

24061, United States of America,

ralphb@vt.edu

This paper applies Normalized Systems Theory (NST) as a new framework for the

modular design of service systems. We synthesize a prescription for service system

design from principles of NST and principles of the Viable Systems Approach

(VSA). A mathematical model of the effects of system coupling on evolvability

and entropy is derived. Evolvability and entropy are related to autopoiesis,

homeostasis and viability. An example of an NST-inspired service system design is

provided.

SA53

53-Room 107B, CC

Experiments in Supply Chains

Sponsor: Behavioral Operations Management

Sponsored Session

Chair: Andrew Davis, Cornell University, 401J Sage Hall, Ithaca, NY,

14850, United States of America,

adavis@cornell.edu

1 - Inventory Decisions under Epistemic and Aleatory

Demand Uncertainty

John Aloysius, University of Arkansas, WCOB 475d University of

Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, 72701, United States of America,

JAloysius@walton.uark.edu

, Siqi Ma

Research on inventory decisions under uncertainty has primarily focused on

aleatory uncertainty due to stochastic variability. Epistemic uncertainty due to a

lack of confidence in knowledge however routinely features in such decisions.

Our experiment orthogonally manipulates the two forms of uncertainty in a

newsvendor task. We partial out biases due to each form of uncertainty and also

report on learning as well as interaction effects.

2 - Bargaining and the Allocation of Risk in Supply Chains:

An Experimental Study

Kyle Hyndman, University of Texas at Dallas, 800 W Campbell Rd

(SM 31), Richardson, TX, 75080, United States of America,

KyleB.Hyndman@utdallas.edu,

Andrew Davis

We study the impact of bargaining and inventory risk location in a supply chain.

We conduct a human-subjects experiment where a retailer and supplier engage in

free-form bargaining over wholesale price, order quantity and inventory location.

We show: (1) our bargaining environment leads to higher efficiency than in past

studies; (2) the party incurring the inventory risk always earns a substantially

lower profit than the other party; (3) more restrictive environments lead to lower

efficiency.

3 - Sharing in the Benefits of Learning-by-doing: A Laboratory Study

of Procurement Auction Mechanisms

Blair Flicker, PhD Candidate, The University of Texas at Dallas,

800 W Campbell Road, Mailstop AD23, Richardson, TX, 75208,

United States of America,

bflicker@utdallas.edu,

Wedad Elmaghraby, Elena Katok

Buyers looking to share in suppliers’ learning-by-doing savings can either (i) draft

long-term contracts with payment reduction schedules or (ii) encourage

competition via sequential short-term contracts. Theoretically, there is minimal

cost difference between the two approaches, but behavioral findings suggest that

humans do respond differentially to the two mechanisms.

4 - Supply Base Diversification in the Presence of High Impact,

Low Probability Supply Disruptions

Doug Thomas, Penn State, 463 Business Building, University

Park, PA, 16802, United States of America,

dthomas@psu.edu

,

Mirko Kremer, Kyle Goldschmidt, Chris Craighead

We investigate sourcing decisions in the presence of high impact, low probability

supply disruptions. We develop a model that captures a key sourcing tradeoff: A

consolidated (diversified) supply base reduces (increases) transaction costs but

increases (reduces) the exposure to disruptions. We predict, and using a

laboratory experiment, find evidence for, an oscillating pattern - decision makers

diversify immediately after a severe disruption and consolidate during stretches

without disruptions.

SA54

54-Room 108A, CC

Data-Driven Stochastic Programming

using Phi-Divergences

Cluster: Tutorials

Invited Session

Chair: Guzin Bayraksan, Associate Professor, The Ohio State University,

Integrated Systems Engineering, Columbus, OH, 43209, United States

of America,

bayraksan.1@osu.edu

1 - Data-Driven Stochastic Programming using Phi-Divergences

Guzin Bayraksan, Associate Professor, The Ohio State University,

Integrated Systems Engineering, Columbus, OH, 43209,

United States of America,

bayraksan.1@osu.edu

, David K. Love

Phi-divergences provide a measure of distance between two probability

distributions. They can be used in data-driven stochastic optimization to create an

ambiguity set of distributions centered around a nominal distribution and hedge

against distributional uncertainty. In this tutorial, we present two-stage models

with distributional uncertainty using phi-divergences and tie them to risk-averse

optimization. We examine the value of collecting additional data and discuss

convergence properties.

SA55

55-Room 108B, CC

Airline Economics: Competition and Collaboration

Sponsor: Aviation Applications

Sponsored Session

Chair: Yi Liu, UC Berkeley, 107 McLaughlin Hall, Berkeley, Ca, 94720,

United States of America,

liuyi.feier@gmail.com

1 - Airline Competition and Market Frequency: A Comparison of the

S-curve and Schedule Delay Models

Yi Liu, UC Berkeley, 107 McLaughlin Hall, Berkeley, CA, 94720,

United States of America,

liuyi.feier@gmail.com

, Mark Hansen

We compare two models for an airline market served by identical carriers who

compete on fare and frequency: s-curve model and schedule delay model. They

only differ structurally with respect to how they handle frequency competition.

The demand side of our model is an approximation of a nested logit model which

yields endogenous travel demand by including not travelling in the choice set.

The results of our comparison support the schedule delay model over the s-curve

model.

2 - Game-theoretic and Empirical Models for Airline Capacity and

Fare Decisions under Competition

Vikrant Vaze, Assistant Professor, Dartmouth, 14 Engineering

Drive, Hanover, NH, 03755, United States of America,

Vikrant.S.Vaze@dartmouth.edu

, Reed Harder

Airline capacity and fare decisions under competition affect passenger choice and

the overall efficiency of airline networks. We develop Nash equilibrium models as

well as empirical models to characterize these interactions. We analytically prove

desirable properties of the resulting games and describe numerical experiments

that extend our theoretical results to more complicated competition settings. Our

results, validated against real-world data, provide new insights into airline

competition.

3 - An Equitable and Collaborative Mechanism for Scheduling

Interventions at Congested Airports

Alexandre Jacquillat, PhD Candidate, Massachusetts Institute of

Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Building E40-240,

Cambridge, MA, 02116, United States of America,

alexandre.jacquillat@gmail.com

, Vikrant Vaze

Flight scheduling interventions can mitigate airport congestion by controlling the

imbalances between peak-hour demand and capacity. We design, optimize and

assess non-monetary congestion-mitigating scheduling mechanisms that ensure

inter-airline equity and enable airline collaboration. Theoretical and

computational results suggest that large equity gains can be achieved at small

efficiency losses and that accounting for airline preferences can improve the

outcome of scheduling interventions.

SA53