Background Image
Previous Page  59 / 552 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 59 / 552 Next Page
Page Background

INFORMS Philadelphia – 2015

57

4 - A Majority-judgment-based Multi-criteria Consensus

Building Method

Chiwei Yan, Massachusetts Institute of Technology,

77 Massachusetts Avenue, E40-130, Cambridge,

United States of America,

chiwei@mit.edu,

Michael Ball,

Vikrant Vaze, Prem Swaroop, Cynthia Barnhart

We propose a multi-criteria consensus building method based on Majority

Judgment proposed by Balinski and Laraki recently. This problem setting

originally stems from strategic air traffic flow management, but is applicable to a

wide range of social choice problems. We propose two methods: 1) a multi-round

estimation approach and 2) a single-shot robust approach to find majority winner

under this setting. Case studies from real-world applications demonstrate the

effectiveness of our approach.

SA56

56-Room 109A, CC

Hub Location

Sponsor: Location Analysis

Sponsored Session

Chair: Sibel Alumur, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue

West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada,

sibel.alumur@uwaterloo.ca

1 - Models and Algorithms for Robust Hub Location

Ivan Contreras, Concordia University and Interuniversity

Research Center on Enterprise Networks, Logistics and

Transportation (CIRRELT), H3G 1M8, MONTREAL, Qu, Canada,

ivan.contreras@cirrelt.ca

, Jean - Francois Cordeau, Carlos Zetina

In this talk we present robust hub location problems in which uncertainty is

associated with demands and flow costs. We study three robust counterparts of

the uncapacitated hub location problem with multiple assignments. The first

focuses on demand uncertainty, the second one deals with flow cost uncertainty

and the third one considers both demand and flow cost uncertainty. We present

mathematical models and exact algorithms for each one of these variants.

Computational experiments are reported.

2 - On Single-allocation P-hub Median Location Problems with Flow

Thresholds-based Discounts

Armin Lüer Villagra, Universidad Andres Bello, Engineering

Sciences Department, Antonio Varas 880, Piso 6, Providencia,

Santiago, Chile,

armin.luer@unab.cl,

H A Eiselt,

Vladimir Marianov

Appropriate modeling of economies of scale on hub and spoke networks is an

active research trend. We present a single allocation p-hub location problem

where a fixed discount is applied to the flow in an arc if it exceeds a fixed

threshold, and the inter-hub network can be incomplete. We solve using standard

software and literature instances. Aggregated performance indicators are used to

analyze and compare solutions. The results show the appropriateness of our

model.

3 - Hub Network Design in Air Transportation

Armaghan Alibeyg, Concordia University and Interuniversity

Research Center on Enterprise Networks, Logistics and

Transportation (CIRRELT), 1455 de Maisonneuve Blvd. West,

Montreal, QC, H3G 1M8, Canada,

a.alibeig@gmail.com

,

Elena Fernández, Ivan Contreras

We present a class of hub network design problems that consider a profit-oriented

objective. Potential application arise in the design of air transportation networks,

where companies need to determine not only the location of hub facilities but

also the design of the hub network. This class of problems considers the

simultaneous optimization of the collected profit, the setup cost of the hub

network and the transportation cost.

4 - The Design of Capacitated Intermodal Hub Networks with

Different Vehicle Types

Sibel Alumur, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue

West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada,

sibel.alumur@uwaterloo.ca,

Elif Zeynep Serper

We determine the locations and capacities of hubs, which transportation modes to

serve at hubs, allocation of non-hub nodes to hubs, and the number of vehicles of

each type to operate on the hub network to route the demand between origin-

destination pairs with minimum total cost. A mixed-integer programming model

is developed and a local search heuristic is proposed. Computational analyses are

conducted on the Turkish network and CAB data sets.

SA57

57-Room 109B, CC

Real Options in the Energy Sector

Sponsor: ENRE – Energy I – Electricity

Sponsored Session

Chair: Afzal Siddiqui, University College London, Department of

Statistical Science, Gower Street, London, UK, WC1E 6BT,

United Kingdom,

afzal.siddiqui@ucl.ac.uk

1 - Structural Estimation of Real Switching Options in

Peak Power Plants

Stein-erik Fleten, NTNU, Industrial Economics and Technology

mana, Trondheim, Norway,

Stein-Erik.Fleten@iot.ntnu.no,

Carl J. Ullrich, Erik Haugom, Alois Pichler

Peak power plants have high operating and maintenance costs when kept ready

to operate. Therefore, plant managers sometimes put their plants in a standby

state, or retire them. Using structural estimation, we estimate the maintenance

cost for the operating states (operating ready, standby) and switching costs for

startup, shutdown and retirement actions. Our approach extends recent

contributions in structural estimation, combining nonparametric statistics with

nonlinear programming.

2 - Real Options Analysis of Investments in Flexibility Measures for

Gas-fired Power Plants

Reinhard Madlener,

RMadlener@eonerc.rwth-aachen.de

,

Barbara Glensk, Christiane Rosen

Conventional power generation will remain important for quite some time for

balancing electricity demand and supply. We propose a real options model for the

flexible operation of existing gas-fired power plants, enabling to study the optimal

timing of investment and valuation of alternative flexibility measures. We use the

spark spread for valuing the flexible plant operation in light of different load

levels and corresponding efficiency factors. The proposed model is applied to a

case study.

3 - Capacity Mechanisms and Investment Decisions in

Electricity Market

Ryuta Takashima, Tokyo University of Science, 2641 Yamazaki,

Noda-shi, Chiba, Japan,

takashima@rs.tus.ac.jp

, Yuto Takano,

Naoki Makimoto, Yuji Yamada

The power producers can sell their generating capacities kWe in a market of the

capacity or via a bilateral contract by means of a capacity mechanism. In this

paper, we consider an investment problem of capacity expansion taking into

account a scheme of the capacity mechanisms. We analyze an investment timing

for different ratios of selling the capacity. In addition, we compare the investment

timing for the standard energy-only market with that for the capacity market.

4 - Transmission and Power Generation Capacity Investment

under Uncertainty

Verena Hagspiel, Norwegian University of Science and

Technology, Alfred Getz vei 3, Trondheim, Norway,

verena.hagspiel@iot.ntnu.no

, Afzal Siddiqui, Jannicke Sletten,

Nora Midttun

In a decentralized electricity market transmission system operators must

anticipate the investment behaviour of power companies when deciding on

investment transmission-capacity expansion. We propose a novel RO model that

captures both the investment decisions of a TSO and power companies allowing

to account for the conflicting objectives of the distinct agents and study how

potential generation expansion affects the optimal timing and sizing of

transmission expansion.

SA57