Background Image
Previous Page  93 / 552 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 93 / 552 Next Page
Page Background

INFORMS Philadelphia – 2015

91

SB76

76-Room 204C, CC

Efficient Learning in Stochastic Optimization

Sponsor: Simulation

Sponsored Session

Chair: Ilya Ryzhov, University of Maryland, 4322 Van Munching Hall,

Robert H. Smith School of Business, College Park, MD, 20742,

United States of America,

iryzhov@rhsmith.umd.edu

1 - Cost-efficient Learning for Crowdsourced Ranking

Qihang Lin, The University of Iowa, 21 East Market Street, Iowa

City, IA, 52245, United States of America,

qihang-lin@uiowa.edu

,

Xi Chen, Kevin Jiao

Crowdsourcing is often used as a tool to rank a list of items based on pairwise

comparisons. However, the comparison results by crowdsourcing have a low

quality due to unreliable workers. To reduce the cost and increase the accuracy of

ranking, we propose a multistage strategy where pairs of items are assigned to

workers based on a joint learning of item’s ranking and worker’s reliability. The

performances of our strategies are evaluated over simulated and real data.

2 - Sequential Allocation for Customer Acquisition

Eric Schwartz, University of Michigan,

ericmsch@umich.edu

,

Katie Yang, Peter Fader

To acquire customers, firms allocate resources across a range of sources of

acquisition, but they are uncertain about which ones are best. Over time they

learn about their customers and sequentially reallocate their resources to earn a

better return on acquisition spend. We frame the sequential acquisition decisions

as a multi-armed bandit problem, and comparing a set of acquisition policies to

assess their ability to acquire from the right sources of customers.

3 - Optimal Dynamic Pricing with Demand Model Uncertainty:

A Squared-Coefficient-of-Variation Rule

Bora Keskin, Duke University, Fuqua School of Business,

100 Fuqua Drive, Durham, NC, 27708-0120,

United States of America,

bora.keskin@duke.edu

We consider a price-setting firm that sells a product over a continuous time

horizon. The firm is uncertain about the sensitivity of demand to price changes,

and updates its prior belief on an unobservable sensitivity parameter by observing

demand responses. We derive and solve a partial differential equation to show

how the value of learning should be projected onto prices in an optimal fashion.

4 - Expected Improvement is Equivalent to OCBA

Ilya Ryzhov, University of Maryland, 4322 Van Munching Hall,

Robert H. Smith School of Business, College Park, MD, 20742,

United States of America,

iryzhov@rhsmith.umd.edu

We consider ranking and selection with independent normal observations, and

analyze the asymptotic sampling rates of expected improvement (EI) methods in

this setting. EI often performs well in practice, but general rate results have been

largely unavailable. We prove that variants of EI produce simulation allocations

that are essentially identical to those chosen by the optimal computing budget

allocation (OCBA) methodology. This is the first general equivalence result

between EI and OCBA.

SB77

77-Room 300, CC

Supply Chain Management II

Contributed Session

Chair: Ehsan Bolandifar, Assistant Professor, The Chinese University of

HongKong, Room 922, 9/F, Cheng Yu Tung Building, No.12,

Chak Cheung Street, Shatin, N.T., HongKong, Hong Kong - PRC,

ehsan@baf.cuhk.edu.hk

1 - Cooperative Replenishment in the Presence of Intermediaries

Behzad Hezarkhani, Assistant Professor, Nottingham University

Business School, Jubilee Campus, Nottingham, United Kingdom,

behzad.hezarkhani@nottingham.ac.uk

, Marco Slikker,

Tom Van Woensel

In complex supply chains, individual downstream buyers would often rather

replenish from intermediaries than directly from manufacturers. Direct

replenishment from manufacturers can be a less costly alternative when carried

out by the buyers cooperatively. This talk presents a framework for

cooperative/non-cooperative replenishment in multi-product supply chains with

intermediaries.

2 - Two-class Single-period Inventory Allocation Policies in Smart

Meter Installation Projects

Behzad Samii, Vlerick Business School, Ave de Boulevard 21,

Brussels, Belgium,

behzad.samii@vlerick.com

Smart meter device are the costliest elements of rollout projects. Complexity

stems from supply inflexibility due to strict tendering procedures and high

holding cost due to fast obsolescence. If some partial information regarding the

bottom line impact of a shortage in one customer class compared to the other can

be conjectured, then we can derive closed form expressions for the expected

number of units short in each demand class under commonly used SN and TN

nesting allocation mechanisms.

3 - Architecting Fail-safe Supply Networks

Shabnam Rezapour, The University of Oklahoma, 2248 Houston

Ave., apt # 2, Norman, OK, 73071, United States of America,

shabnam_rezapoor@yahoo.com

, Amirhossein Khosrojerdi,

Janet K. Allen, Farrokh Mistree

A fail-safe network is one which mitigates the impact of disruptions and provides

an acceptable service level. This is achieved by designing its topology (structurally

fail-safe) and coordinating flow dynamics (operationally fail-safe). We analyze the

importance of being robust, resilient, and controllable in having structurally fail-

safe against disruptions. We show to have an operationally fail-safe supply

network, flow dynamics should be reliable against demand and supply-side

variations.

4 - Waveless Warehousing ? Why and Why Not ?

Adrian Kumar, Exel Inc, 570 Polaris Parkway, Westerville, OH,

United States of America,

adrian.kumar@exel.com,

Manjeet Singh

E-fulfillment operations constantly struggle with processing peak volumes quickly

due to system, labor and equipment constraints. Waveless is a dynamic order

fulfillment method that pulls demand into a resource/sub-system when it

becomes available. The dynamic order set is built on optimal real time decisions

based on productivity, equipment utilization, etc. This study defines complete and

partial waveless systems and discusses the pros and cons of implementing them.

5 - Component Procurement through Group

Purchasing Organizations

Ehsan Bolandifar, Assistant Professor, The Chinese University of

Hong Kong, Room 922, 9/F, Cheng Yu Tung Building, No.12,

Chak Cheung Street, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong - PRC,

ehsan@baf.cuhk.edu.hk

, Mojtaba Soleimani

This paper studies component procurement in a supply chain setting where two

competing Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) source a common

component from a competitive supply market. We assume that ordering happens

after procurement negotiations, i.e., OEMs first compete in the market before

they negotiate for their component procurement potentially through Group

Purchasing Organizations (GPOs). We show that procurement through a GPO

may hurt an OEM with a lower bargaining power.

SB78

78-Room 301, CC

Supply Chain Practice and Empirics

Contributed Session

Chair: Faraz Ramtin, University of Central Florida, 2011 Puritan Rd,

Orlando, FL, 32807, United States of America,

faraz.ramtin@ucf.edu

1 - Is Supply Chain Success Emulatable? A Framework of Analogous

Learning from Supply Chains and a Case Study

Violette Wen, PhD Student, The University of Auckland,

12 Grafton Rd, CBD, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand,

violette.wen@auckland.ac.nz,

Tiru Arthanari

We explore the feasibility of emulating from one successful supply chain to

another produce line in agri-fresh produce. The case will study the state-of-art

New Zealand kiwifruit supply chain and provide a framework with key enablers

and disenablers for transferring knowledge to the struggling Xinjiang Hami melon

industry in China. The research will provide rich empirical evidence about a

developing country’s agri-fresh supply chain at various levels.

2 - The Inventory Value of Cross Docking in a Supply Chain:

An Empirical Study

Xingyue Zhang, Lehigh University, 621 Taylor Street, Bethlehem,

PA, 18015, United States of America,

xiz313@lehigh.edu,

Oliver Yao, Jiazhen Huo, Yongrui Duan

Cross docking is a supply chain strategy to enhance supply chain performance by

directly moving inbound orders to outbound shipments without storage. Using a

large-scale, SKU level data set collected from a large retail chain, we find that

cross docking reduces store-level inventory by 101 units on average and that cross

docking is more beneficial to reduce inventories for products with higher prices or

higher demand rate, or for the stores that are closer to their distribution center.

SB78