Previous Page  272 / 432 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 272 / 432 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

N E W S

AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 1994

P r o t o c o l o n C r o s s - B o r d er P r a c t i c e

A p p r o v e d

The Council of the Society has

approved the adoption of a Protocol

on Cross-Border Practice agreed

between the Law Societies of Ireland,

England and Wales, Scotland and

Northern Ireland.

Noting that the requirements imposed

on solicitors qualified in one

jurisdiction who wish to qualify in

another jurisdiction have been greatly

simplified in recent years and that the

number of solicitors who would be

qualified to practise in more than one

of the four jurisdictions is growing,

the Protocol sets out agreed principles

which each of the four Law Societies

will follow in regard to certain aspects

of practice in relation to solicitors

holding practising certificates in more

than one jurisdiction.

The Protocol covers co-operation

between the four Societies concerning

the requirements to obtain

professional indemnity cover,

compliance with accounts regulations,

contributions to the Compensation

Funds of the respective jurisdictions,

complaints and discipline. The

Protocol provides that a solicitor must

adhere to the particular requirements

of each jurisdiction in which he

wishes to hold a practising certificate

and allows for an exchange of

appropriate information between

relevant Law Societies concerning

regulation of solicitors who hold a

practising certificate in more than one

of the four jurisdictions.

Doubts about Compensation Fund

Provisions

While the Council approved the

Protocol, some doubts were expressed

concerning its provisions relating to

Guarantee/Compensation Funds. Each

of the four Societies operates a Fund.

The Protocol, recognising that

problems may arise in identifying

which Fund would be liable in the

case of dishonesty by a solicitor

holding a practising in more than one

jurisdiction, provides for arbitration in

the event that, following investigation,

the Societies involved cannot reach

agreement on whose Fund should

meet the claim.

Some Council members were of the

view that the Protocol did not take

account of a provision in the

Solicitors (Amendment) Bill, 1994

which would permit the Society to

provide that no contribution to the

Compensation Fund would be payable

by a solicitor who resided outside the

State and was engaged in the

provision of legal services outside

the State.

The President of the Society assured

the Council that this aspect of the

Protocol would be discussed with the

other Law Societies in the light of the

provision in the Bill.

S o c i e t y ' s S o l i c i t o r s

s h o u l d A d v o c a t e

If the Society did not use its own

solicitors in actions before the courts,

it would be failing in its duty to prove

the assertion that solicitors were

sufficiently capable and experienced

to be appointed as judges in the higher

courts, according to Past-President,

Donal Binchy,

who made the remark

in the course of a discussion at the

Council meeting on 22 July last about

the legal costs incurred by the Society.

He noted that the President of the

High Court was on record as stating

that solicitors were equally welcome

before the Court as barristers. Many

Council members supported Mr

Binchy's view, adding that the

Society's solicitors were more than

capable of prosecuting cases before

the High Court and, indeed, had done

so in the recent past.

The view was taken by the Council

that, from now on, the use of counsel

would be assessed on a case by case

basis with a view to keeping the

Society's legal costs to a minimum. •

N e w P r a c t i c e

M a n a g e m e n t

G u i d e l i n e s t o A s s i s t

F i r ms

Practice Management Guidelines,

intended as 'a practical management

tool' to benefit solicitors and their

clients, have been drafted by the

Practice Management Committee of

the Society and circulated to Council

members of the Society.

The Guidelines provide a basis by

which solicitors, irrespective of the

size of their practice, may measure the

way they currently manage their

practices and set out checklists for

planning improvements and

development of their practices.

The Guidelines cover five broad areas

of management:

• services and forward planning

• case management

• office administration and

management structure

• financial management

• managing people.

The Practice Management Committee

believes that adherence to the

Guidelines will assist solicitors in

their dealings with clients and in

ensuring compliance with the

Solicitors Accounts and Advertising

Regulations and the Guide to

Professional Conduct. The Guidelines

will also assist firms which wish to

gain 'Q Mark' accreditation.

Council members have been asked

to forward their views on the draft

Guidelines to the Practice

Management Committee and it is

intended that the final draft of the

Guidelines will be put before the

Council for formal approval

at its next meeting on

16 September.

248