Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  41 / 127 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 41 / 127 Next Page
Page Background

* One type of information is considered confidential and is provided via secured

platform.

1) In Austria in case of a daily imbalance > 24 MWh, balancing actions per balance group

are triggered by MAM in the name and on behalf of the BGR. No costs/revenues for the

MAM, the BGR pays/receives the market price to/from the VTP. Hourly short imbalanced

positions with short Market Area Position and short Carry forward account will be

charged by balancing incentive mark-up. Finally, a last line of defence for balancing is

to curtail imbalanced balance group, which causes network instability. Those balanc-

ing incentive mark-ups generate income, which is accumulated and used to reduce

transmission charges in future periods. As the balancing incentive mark-ups were

massively reduced since their introduction, the effect in total is small. As the MAM did

not take measures for physical balancing, the total sum of the balancing incentive

mark-up for 2013 – 2015 was returned to the network users via lower tariffs.

2) At the IP Remich between Germany and Luxemburg the re-nomination lead time on the

Luxembourg side is two hours and 15 minutes. The additional time is used by Creos

Luxemburg to re-nominate in case suppliers do not fulfil their nominations obligations/

restrictions based on the forecast offtake at this IP. For all other IPs, the standard lead

time of 2 hours applies.

3) Portugal has partially implemented the provisions of applicable price. Even though

neither a trading platform nor STSPs have yet been implemented, a default rule for

derivation of weighted average price is in place, taking into account the trades at the

PVB (Spanish Virtual Trading Point). According to the NRA's decision, Mibgás, S.A.,

operating the Spanish Trading platform at the Spanish VTP (PVB) shall be the future

Market Operator in Portugal.

Table 5:

Overview table of selected information on implementation by 1 October 2016

4.2 OVERVIEW TABLE OF DEGREE OF IMPLEMENTATION

OF BAL NC

4) Please see also the previous report regarding more details which have not been reported as an update.

Without covering all the topics and all the details that are available in the report table 5 below displays

a selection of information with the aim of providing an overview on the implementation state of BAL

NC in countries by 1 October 2016. For more detailed information on the implementation status in

the countries, refer to the annexes 

4)

of this report.

Overview table of selected information on implementation by 1 October 2016

Country

Trading platform

(in place/

foreseen date)

STSPs

(only title/also

others/under

discussion/

no plans)

Balancing

services (in

place/foreseen

or discussed/

none)

Hourly re-nomi-

nation cycle,

Standard Re-

nomination lead

time (≤2hrs)

Cluster 2015

Trade notifica-

tions and lead

time (30min / 

30mins <x

≤2hrs/>2hrs)

Types of infor-

mation provision

art. 32 BAL NC

(total out of 3)

Information Model

(with established

forecasting

party)

Daily Imbalance

Charge/imple-

mented by

1 October 2016

Neutrality

arrangements

implemented

Cluster 2015

AT

In place

Only title

None

Yes

30 min

3*

Base case

(Third Party)

Yes

No

1)

BE/LU

In place

Only title

None

Yes 

2)

30 min

3

Variant 1 (TSO)

Yes

Yes

DE

In place

Also others

In place

Yes

30 min

3*

Variant 2 (DSO)

Yes

Yes

DK

In place

Only title

None

Yes

30 min < x ≤ 2 h 3

Base case (TSO)

Yes

Other

mechanism

FR

In place

Also others

None

Yes

30 min

3*

Base case (TSO)

Yes

Yes

HU

In place

Also others

None

Yes

30 min

3*

Variant 1

(Third Party not

implemented yet)

Yes

Yes

NL

In place

Also others

None

Yes

30 min

3*

Variant 1

(Third Party)

Yes

Yes

SI

In place

Only title

In place

Yes

30 min < x ≤ 2 h 3

Variant 1 (TSO)

Yes

Yes

UK-GB

In place

Also others

None

Yes

30 min < x ≤ 2 h 3*

Base case (TSO)

Yes

Yes

Cluster 2016

CZ

In place

Only title

foreseen

(1 July 2016)

In place

Yes

30 min

3

Base case

(Third Party)

Yes

Yes partially

ES

In place

Also others

None

Yes

30 min

3*

Base case

(Third Party)

Yes

Yes

HR

Planned by

1 April 2017

Under discus-

sion

In place

Yes

30 min < x ≤ 2 h 3

(Designation of

Third Party in

progress)

Under

development

No

IT

In place

Only title

foreseen

Yes

30 min

3

Base case (TSO)

Yes

Yes

PT

Planned

Under

discussion

In place

Yes

30 min

3

Variant 2 (TSO)

Yes partially 

3)

Yes

ENTSOG BAL NC Monitoring Report 2016 |

41