Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  154 / 1096 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 154 / 1096 Next Page
Page Background

S141

ESTRO 36

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Purpose or Objective

Prostate cancer is the most frequent malignancy in

African-Caribbean men, a population sharing common

genetic traits with African-American (AA) but presenting

also genomic and epidemiologic specificities. Despite

socio-economic disparities with French mainland, all

patients were treated within the French state-financed

equal-access healthcare system. In this study, we report

biochemical outcomes of patients treated by

brachytherapy in our department from 2005 to 2014 in an

African-Caribbean population

Material and Methods

370 consecutive patients receiving I125 brachytherapy as

a curative treatment for early-stage (localized) disease

between 2005 and 2014 were recorded. Selected patients

presented with low risk disease: initial PSA (iPSA) < 10

ng/mL, clinical stage <= T2a, Gleason <7. Patients with

intermediate risk of recurrence were also included on a

case to case basis with PSA <15 or Gleason 7 (3+4).

Biochemical failure free-survival (BFFS) was defined

according to the ASTRO nadir+2 definition.

Results

The 3-year and 5-year BFFS for the entire cohort were

98.3% and 91.6% respectively. For patients with low and

intermediate-risk disease, the 5-year BBFS rates were 92.1

and 90.8%, respectively. In univariate and multivariate

analysis, only Gleason score (

˂

7 vs 7;

P

= 0.030

˂

0.05) was

a significant predictor of biochemical failure. The overall

rate of late and acute grade 2 or higher Genito-urinary

toxicity was 12.6% and 10.3 %.

Conclusion

In this large single-center series, brachytherapy achieved

excellent rates of medium-term biochemical control in

both low- and selected intermediate-risk localized

prostate cancer in African-caribean patients.

Brachytherapy seems to be an excellent choice of

treatment, with excellent outcomes and limited morbidity

for African-Caribbean populations. To our knowledge, our

series is the first presenting brachytherapy results in this

specific population.

OC-0274 Comparison of MRI/CT fusion and CT for

prostate post-implant dosimetry using sector analysis

N. Katayama

1

, M. Takemoto

2

, A. Takamoto

3

, S.

Sugiyama

1

, K. Hisazumi

1

, K. Watanabe

1

, H. Ihara

1

, K.

Katsui

1

, Y. Nasu

3

, S. Kanazawa

3

1

Okayama University Graduate School of Health Sciences,

Department of Radiology, Okayama, Japan

2

Himeji Red Cross Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy,

Himeji, Japan

3

Okayama University Graduate School of Health Sciences,

Department of Urology, Okayama, Japan

Purpose or Objective

Anatomical structures are well defined, so MRI/CT fusion

is considered the best method for postimplant dosimetry

of permanent prostate brachytherapy. We compared the

results obtained from MRI/CT fusion-based dosimetry with

those of CT-based dosimetry using sector analysis, and

analyzed the factors associated with the difference of the

whole prostate dose between the two dosimetry. This is

the first report which evaluated those factors using 3-

Tesla MRI in which contouring and fusion are thought to be

more accurate than in 1.5-Tesla MRI.

Material and Methods

The subjects were 81 consecutive patients treated with

144 Gy of brachytherapy alone using loose I-125

radioactive seeds. For postimplant analysis, CT and MRI

scans were obtained at 1 month after implantation. CT

and 3-Tesla T2-weighted MR images were fused and

aligned on the basis of seed distribution in MRI/CT fusion-

based dosimetry. Dosimetry was computed for the whole

prostate and for the prostate divided into anterior and

posterior sectors of the base, mid-gland, and apex (Fig.

1). The volumetric and dosimetric results were compared

between MRI/CT fusion-based and CT-based dosimetry

using a paired t test. Factors associated with the absolute

value of the difference of D90 between the two dosimetry

(|D90MRI/CT - D90CT|) were analyzed by multiple

regression. P values of <0.05 were defined to be

significant.

Results

D90 (176.7 Gy vs 173.0 Gy; p = 0.003) and V100 (97.2% vs

96.5%; p = 0.013) were significantly higher in MRI/CT

fusion-based dosimetry than in CT-based dosimetry.

Prostate volume (28.5 mL vs 30.8 mL; p < 0.001) was

significantly lower in MRI/CT fusion-based dosimetry than

CT-based dosimetry. Sector analysis showed a decrease in

MRI/CT fusion D90 at the anterior base (154.9 Gy vs 166.5

Gy; p < 0.001) and the posterior apex (169.7 Gy vs 177.6

Gy; p < 0.001), and increase in MRI/CT fusion D90 in the

anterior mid-gland (195.2 Gy vs 181.7 Gy; p < 0.001), the

posterior mid-gland (196.1 Gy vs 193.9 Gy; p = 0.030), and

the anterior apex (198.7 Gy vs 175.0 Gy; p < 0.001).

|D90MRI/CT - D90CT| was largest at the anterior apex

sector among 6 sectors (27.2 Gy). On multivariate

analysis, |D90MRI/CT - D90CT| of whole prostate are

associated with |prostate volume (PV)MRI/CT - PVCT| (p

= 0.036), |D90MRI/CT - D90CT| at the posterior base

sector (p = 0.035), |D90MRI/CT - D90CT| at the anterior

mid-gland sector (p = 0.011), and |D90MRI/CT - D90CT| at

the anterior apex sector (p = 0.004) (Table 1).

Conclusion

Several postimplant dosimetric variables were

significantly different on MRI/CT fusion vs CT. The

differences between the two methods of PV, D90 at the

posterior base, anterior mid-gland, and anterior apex

sectors may greatly influence the difference of D90 of the

whole prostate.

Proffered Papers: Physics treatment verification

OC-0275 Testing an MR-compatible afterloader for MR-

based source tracking in MRI guided HDR

brachytherapy

E. Beld

1

, P.R. Seevinck

2

, J. Schuurman

3

, F. Zijlstra

2

, M.A.

Viergever

2

, J.J.W. Lagendijk

1

, M.A. Moerland

1

1

UMC Utrecht, Department of Radiotherapy, Utrecht,

The Netherlands

2

UMC Utrecht, Image Sciences Institute, Utrecht, The

Netherlands

3

Elekta NL, Veenendaal, The Netherlands

Purpose or Objective