Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  155 / 1096 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 155 / 1096 Next Page
Page Background

S142

ESTRO 36

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

In HDR brachytherapy, image guidance is crucial for

accurate and safe dose delivery. Accordingly, MR-guided

HDR brachytherapy is in development at our institution.

This study demonstrates the testing of a recently

developed MR-compatible afterloader, while operating

simultaneously with MR imaging, as well as an MR-based

method for real-time source position verification.

Material and Methods

Experimental set-up:

A prototype of an MR-compatible afterloader (Flexitron,

Elekta) was developed. This afterloader was made MR-

compatible by providing every part as well as the cover

with RF shielding. The source cable was replaced by a

plastic cable containing a piece of steel at its tip, serving

as a dummy source. The afterloader was placed next to

the MRI scanner and connected to a catheter positioned in

an Agar phantom (doped with MnCl2), see Fig. 1.

Afterloader management:

The afterloader was programmed to send the source (I) to

10 dwell positions, with a 10 mm step size, remaining 10 s

at each position, and (II) to 20 dwell positions, with a 5

mm step size, remaining 0.5 s at each position.

MRI acquisition:

While sending the source to its predefined dwell positions,

MR imaging was carried out on a 1.5 T MR scanner (Ingenia,

Philips) using a 2D gradient echo sequence (TR/TE 2.2/1.0

ms, slice thickness 10 mm, FOV 192x192 mm, acq. matrix

96x96, flip angle 30°, SENSE=2), scanning two orthogonal

slices interleaved with a temporal resolution of 0.114 s per

image.

HDR source localization:

The MR artifact induced by the magnetic susceptibility of

the metallic source was exploited. The artifacts (complex

data) were simulated based on the susceptibility induced

B0 field disturbance [1]. The localization was executed

offline in a post processing operation by phase-only cross

correlation [1,2], to find the translation between the

experimental image and the simulated artifact.

Results

The experiments demonstrated that the prototype MR-

compatible afterloader and the MRI scanner fully

functioned while operating simultaneously, without

influencing each other. The afterloader was able to send

the source to the predefined dwell positions when placed

next to the MRI scanner, without being attracted to or

being disturbed by the scanner. The HDR source positions

could be determined by the described localization method

(now accomplished offline), see Fig. 2. The average

distances between the determined 3D source positions for

cases (I) and (II) were 9.9±0.2 mm and 5.0±0.2 mm,

respectively. The short dynamic scan time (~0.15 s) and

the fast reconstruction/post processing (<0.15 s)

guarantee that source localization will be possible in real

time.

Conclusion

The MR-compatible afterloader developed in this study

and a commercial 1.5 T MRI scanner were demonstrated

to fully function while operating simultaneously, enabling

real-time HDR source position verification for MR-guided

HDR brachytherapy, using a phase-only cross correlation

localization method.

[1] Beld E. et al. 2015 Proc. Intl. Mag. Reson. Med. 24,

#4151.

[2] De Oliveira A. et al. 2008 MRM

59

1043-1050.

OC-0276 Toward adaptive MR-guided HDR prostate

brachytherapy – Simulation study based on anatomy

movements

M. Borot de Battisti

1

, B. Denis de Senneville

2

, G.

Hautvast

3

, D. Binnekamp

3

, M. Peters

1

, J. Van der Voort

van Zyp

1

, J.J.W. Lagendijk

1

, M. Maenhout

1

, M.A.

Moerland

1

1

University Medical Center Utrecht, Departement of

Radiotherapy, Utrecht, The Netherlands

2

UMR 5251 CNRS/University of Bordeaux, Mathematics,

Talence, France

3

Philips Group Innovation, Biomedical Systems,

Eindhoven, The Netherlands

Purpose or Objective

Dose delivery during a single needle, robotic MR-guided

HDR prostate brachytherapy may be impaired by: (1)

needle insertion errors caused by e.g. needle bending, (2)

unpredictable anatomy movements such as prostate

rotations (induced by the insertion or retraction of the

needle), prostate swelling or intra-procedural rectum or

bladder filling. In this study, a new adaptive dose planning

strategy is proposed to assess the second challenge. The