Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  156 / 1096 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 156 / 1096 Next Page
Page Background

S143

ESTRO 36

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

performance of this approach is evaluated by simulating

brachytherapy procedures using data of 10 patients

diagnosed with prostate cancer.

Material and Methods

Throughout HDR prostate brachytherapy, unpredictable

anatomy movements may cause errors in dose delivery and

potentially, this may result in failure to reach clinical

constraints (e.g. for single fraction monotherapy: D95%

PTV>19 Gy, D10% urethra<21 Gy, D1cc bladder<12 Gy and

D1cc rectum<12 Gy). In this study, a novel adaptive dose

planning pipeline for MR-guided HDR prostate

brachytherapy using a single needle robotic implant

device is proposed to address this issue (Figure 1a). The

dose plan (needle track positions, source positions and

dwell times) and needle insertion sequence are updated

after each needle insertion and retraction with MR–based

feedback on anatomy movements (cf. Figure 1b). The

pipeline was assessed on moving anatomy by simulating

MR-guided HDR prostate brachytherapy with varying

number of needle insertions (from 2 to 14) for 10 patients.

The initial anatomy of the patients was obtained using the

delineations of the prostate tumor and the OAR considered

(urethra, bladder and rectum) on MR images. Each needle

insertion and retraction induced anatomy movements

which were simulated in 2 steps: (1) a typical 3D rotation

of the prostate was imposed (2) a regularization of the

movement in space was then applied. The initial and final

dose parameters were compared in the situations with and

without update of dose plan and needle insertion

sequence.

Results

The computation time for re-planning was less than 90

seconds with a desktop PC. The actual delivered dose

improved with vs. without update of dose plan and needle

insertion sequence: On average, the dose coverage of the

PTV was higher in the situation with vs. without update

(Figure 1c). Moreover, the difference increased with the

number of needle insertions. The dose received by the PTV

in the situation with re-planning was not significantly

different compared to the initial dose plan. Finally, the

dose to the OAR’s was not significantly different between

the initial dose plan and the dose delivered in the situation

with and without update.

Conclusion

This study proposes a new adaptive workflow with

feedback on the anatomy movements for MR-guided HDR

prostate brachytherapy with a single needle robotic

implant device. The assessment of the pipeline showed

that the errors in the dose delivered due to movement of

anatomy can be compensated by updating the dose plan

and the needle insertion sequence based on MRI.

OC-0277 Assessment of the implant geometry in

interstitial brachytherapy by a hybrid tracking system

N. Pallast

1

, M. Kellermeier

1

, K. Kallis

1

, B. Steinmetz

1

, V.

Strnad

1

, C. Bert

1

1

Universitätsklinikum Erlangen- Friedrich-Alexander-

Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Department of Radiation

Oncology, Erlangen, Germany

Purpose or Objective

Electromagnetic tracking (EMT) is a promising g approach

to measure variations of the implant geometry in

interstitial brachytherapy. The coordinate system for EMT

data measurements is usually decoupled from the one of

computed tomography (CT) used for treatment planning.

Therefore, an optical tracking system (OTS) is introduced

to associate EMT and CT coordinate systems. The accuracy

of this hybrid tracking system was investigated in phantom

studies and the system is currently used in a clinical

feasibility study.

Material and Methods

EMT data providing the implant geometry were measured

by an implant sensor integrated in the cable of an

afterloader prototype (Flexitron, Elekta, The

Netherlands). Breathing motion was compensated by

three additional fiducial sensors on the chest.

Simultaneously, an OTS (Polaris, NDI, Canada) collected

data of eight infrared (IR) markers of which three were

attached to the EMT fiducial sensors and five to the skin.

A reproducible marker position was ensured by adhesive

pads glued on the patient prior the first measurement.

To align both coordinate tracking systems, a

transformation between the OTS and EMT (

OTS

T

EMT

) was

estimated by a so-called hand eye calibration. An

additional registration from the OTS to the CT (

CT

T

OTS

) was

determined to associate their coordinate systems. Finally,

both transformations were combined to get a direct

relation

of

EMT-

and

CT-derived

data.

The resulting calibration error of the

OTS

T

EMT

transformation was evaluated by measuring different

poses of an in-house developed calibration tool. This tool