Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  169 / 1096 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 169 / 1096 Next Page
Page Background

S156

ESTRO 36

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

0.6 mm (LR), and 1.0 mm (CC) (Figure 2).

Conclusion

Our study showed that the motion of lung tumours could

be substantially reduced, but not eliminated, using

visually guided DIBH radiotherapy. Intra- and inter-breath-

hold position uncertainty of the tumour and lymph nodes

were mostly less than 2 mm for visually guided DIBH

radiotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer.

OC-0302 Dosimetric evaluation of a global motion

model for MRI-guided radiotherapy

C. Paganelli

1

, S. Albertini

1

, F. Iudicello

1

, B. Whelan

2

, J.

Kipritidis

2

, D. Lee

2

, P. Greer

3

, G. Baroni

1

, P. Keall

2

, M.

Riboldi

1

1

Politecnico di Milano, Dipartimento di Elettronica-

Informazione e Bioingegneria, Milano, Italy

2

University of Sydney, Radiation Physics Laboratory-

Sydney Medical School, Sydney, Australia

3

Calvary Mater Newcastle, Department of Radiation

Oncology, Newcastle, Australia

Purpose or Objective

MRI-Linac therapy will enable real time adaption of

radiotherapy and is being actively developed by several

academic and commercial groups. To acquire images of

high spatial and temporal resolution, interleaved 2D

imaging is typically used. However, to enable closed loop

adaptive radiotherapy, accumulated 3D dose is required.

A possible way to bridge the gap between 2D and 3D

images is via patient-specific motion models. To date, no

dosimetric evaluation of a global motion model based on

interleaved MRI images has been reported. In this work,

we present the use of a global motion model to

compensate for geometric changes during treatment and

to evaluate dosimetric variations between the delivered

and planned dose distributions.

Material and Methods

4DCT and interleaved sagittal/coronal cine-MRI from a

diagnostic scanner (1.5T) were acquired for a lung cancer

patient. A global motion model was built on the 4DCT

dataset using principal component analysis, and updated

through the use of surrogates derived from in-room cine-

MRI data (tumor, diaphragm and lung vessel motion). An

ITV-based IMRT treatment plan (60Gy in 30 fractions) was

developed on the 4DCT and applied to the model output

for dose evaluation. Validation of the motion model was

performed on a CT/MRI XCAT phantom (1mm resolution),

in which the ground truth CT output of the in-room

scenario was available at the time sample of the simulated

cine-MRI. Analysis of different surrogates as well as their

sagittal/coronal motion components were performed in

terms of both geometric and dosimetric variations.

Results

Based on the phantom data, the accuracy of the motion

model was 1.2mm/1.6mm on tumor/diaphragm.

Dosimetric analysis confirmed the ability of the model to

approximate the ground truth (mean differences of

0.49Gy, 0.12Gy and 0.38Gy for PTV D98, PTV D2 and spinal

cord, respectively). For the patient, variations between

the in-room inhale phase and the corresponding planning

phase were 3.1mm/4.9mm on the tumor/diaphragm. With

respect to the planning inhale CT, the model output CT

presented differences mainly on the diaphragm position

(Figure A). Dosimetric changes with respect to the planned

dose were 3.14Gy, 1.82Gy and 0.42Gy for tumor PTV D98,

PTV D2 and spinal cord, respectively (Figure B and C). The

delivered dose was higher than planned since less motion

was present in the MR images than the planning CT.

Conclusion

We provided a dosimetric evaluation based on a global

motion model for MRI-guidance. The proposed model built

on 4DCT was updated based on interleaved 2D MRI data

and validated using a digital phantom. Dosimetric

variations on tumor were observed in the patient study,

demonstrating the utility and importance of using motion

models for dose accumulation. Future work will include

improvements in the motion model for MRI-guidance and

its application to a larger number of patients.

OC-0303 Evaluation of lung anatomy vs. lung volume

reproducibility for scanned proton treatments under

ABC.

L.A. Den Otter

1

, E. Kaza

2

, R.G.J. Kierkels

1

, M.O. Leach

2

,

D.J. Collins

2

, J.A. Langendijk

1

, A.C. Knopf

1

1

UMCG University Medical Center Groningen,

Department of Radiation Oncology, Groningen, The

Netherlands

2

The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden

Hospital, CR-UK Cancer Imaging Centre, London, United

Kingdom

Purpose or Objective

Proton therapy is a highly conformal way to treat cancer.

For the treatment of moving targets, scanned proton

therapy delivery is a challenge, as it is sensitive to motion.

The use of breath hold mitigates motion effects. Due to

the treatment delivery over several fractions with delivery

times extending the feasible breath hold duration, high

reproducibility of breath holds is required. Active

Breathing Control (ABC) is used to perform breath holds

with controlled volumes. We investigated whether the

lung anatomy is as reproducible as lung volumes under

ABC, to consider ABC for scanned proton treatments.

Material and Methods

For five representative volunteers (3 male, 2 female, age:

25-58, BMI: 19 – 29) MR imaging was performed during ABC

at two separate fractions. The image voxel size was

0.7x0.7x3.0 mm

3

. Each fraction consisted of four

subsequent breath holds, resulting in a total of eight MRIs

per volunteer. The interval between fractions was 1-4