![Show Menu](styles/mobile-menu.png)
![Page Background](./../common/page-substrates/page0173.jpg)
S160
ESTRO 36
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
well as diffusion weighted (DW) and dynamic contrast
enhanced (DCE) MR imaging. Voxel-based and regional
correlation analysis of mutual parameter pairs showed
moderate to low parameter correlations. However, on a
patient-to-patient basis large variations were observed for
most parameter correlations.
Consequently, robust and accurate workflows and image
acquisition protocols need to be identified in order to use
multi-parametric functional PET/MR imaging in the future
for adapted RT concepts in a clinical context.
SP-0308 Metabolic and functional MRI integration for
glioblastoma dose-painting trial.
A. Laprie
1
1
Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse Cedex 09, France
The ongoing spectro-glio trial (NCT01507506) is a phase III
multicentric randomized trial for newly diagnosed
glioblastoma.
It has included 165 patients among the 220 planned.
It compares arm A : STUPP protocol ( 60 GY + TMZ) with
arm B that includes an additional SIB targeted at MR
spectroscopic abnomalities ( CHO/NAA>2)+tumor bed at a
dose of 72Gy/2.4Gy
In this presentation we will discuss the original modalities,
the difficulties met and the solutions found for the
particularity of this trial
:
multicentric use of 3D MR spectroscopic imaging
developement of an innovative technique of integration of
MR spectroscopic imaging to RT-scan
centralized delineation of arm B patients - online quality
control of dosimetry in arm B patients
database developement
-
analysis techniques of this large prospective database of
anatomic, perfusion, diffusion and spectroscopic imaging
of glioblastoma.( follow-up every 3 months until relapse)
-preliminary imaging results
SP-0309 Plan of the day and dose-escalation for
bladder cancer (RAIDER Trial)
H. McNair
1
1
The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden
NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, United Kingdom
The major challenge in delivering accurate radiotherapy
to the bladder is to compensate for the daily variation in
organ size, shape and position. This change is mainly due
to differing degrees of bladder filling and can be
influenced by change in rectal volume. The plan of the day
approach has the potential to improve outcomes by
improving target coverage and decrease the dose to
bowel. However the unpredictable nature of bladder
filling and changes in organ dimensions require confident
and timely decision making for treatment delivery. This is
of particular importance when the does to the tumour bed
is escalated. This presentation will discuss the importance
of achieving a representative reference image and the
practicalities of the patient maintaining a consistent
drinking protocol. Clinical examples will be used to
illustrate common imaging problems with appropriate
decision making, in particular when not to proceed to
treatment. The importance of staff training and
maintaining competency to achieve consistent image
selection will also be discussed.
Acknowledgements: Emma Hall, Robert Huddart
and Shasita Hafeez and the RAIDER trials team.
Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance (RTTQA) team. We
also acknowledge funding to the NIHR Biomedical
Research Centre at The Royal Marsden and The Institute
of Cancer Research. Research at The Institute of Cancer
Research is also supported by Cancer Research UK under
Programme C33589/A19727. In addition the national trial
(RAIDER) was funded by Cancer Research UK
(CRUK/14/016)
Symposium: Registration and fusion techniques
SP-0310 Rigid registration techniques for different
imaging modalities
N. Nesvacil
1
1
Medical University of Vienna, Department of
Radiotherapy- CCC- Christian Doppler Laboratory for
Medical Radation Research for Radiation Oncology,
Vienna, Austria
Image registration has become an important part of
treatment planning and execution in 3D image guided
external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy
(BT) during the last decades. In principle, the same
algorithms for rigid or non-rigid image registration can be
applied to either type of radiotherapy. However, for their
application in brachytherapy the presence of the
brachytherapy delivery device, i.e. the applicator, plays
an essential role. This presentation will provide an
overview of rigid registration techniques in
brachytherapy, compared to external beam radiotherapy.
In gynaecological brachytherapy, where the applicator
and CTV might move in relation to the bony anatomy
during the course of a (multi-fractionated) treatment,
applicator-based rigid registration can be used to combine
images for treatment planning acquired with the same or
different modalities at different time points. One of the
most useful applications of this technique is to transfer
target contours defined on a reference image, e.g. an MRI
at the time of the first BT, to subsequent CT image
volumes for planning of further BT fractions, if MRI is not
always available for dose plan adaptation to the anatomy
of the day. Requirements and pitfalls for clinical
applications of this technique will be discussed. In order
to analyse interfraction variations for target and organs at
risk (OARs) based on image volumes acquired at different
time points, rigid image registration can provide a good
estimate of the dosimetric impact of anatomical changes
between applicator, CTV and OARs. Clinical examples will
be discussed for different treatment sites. Limitations of
the technique will be summarized and special focus will
be given to prostate and gynaecological BT treatment
planning.
Multi-modal rigid image registration for brachytherapy is
also used to improve target delineation and dose plan
optimization for a single fraction. MRI acquired before
brachytherapy can be combined with CT images for
treatment planning of prostate cancer, in order to
visualize and delineate intraprostatic lesions as boost
target volumes in HDR or LDR brachytherapy.
In the setting of gynaecological cancer brachytherapy
where only CT is available for visualization of the
applicator and surrounding organs after implantation,
rigid registration of ultrasound images obtained with
applicator in situ could be used in the future for dual
modality dose planning of a single fraction. Challenges and
solutions for the registration of ultrasound and CT images,
such as determining the applicator position in the
ultrasound image volume, will be explored to conclude
this presentation.
SP-0311 Deformable registration for dose summation
K. Tanderup
1
1
Aarhus University Hospital, Department of Oncology,
Aarhus C, Denmark
Dose summation across brachytherapy fractions and
accumulation with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT)
dose is essential for assessment of total dose to both
targets and organs at risk in treatments with fractionated
brachytherapy and in combinations with EBRT.
Brachytherapy
dose
distributions
are
highly