Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  455 / 1096 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 455 / 1096 Next Page
Page Background

S440

ESTRO 36

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

3

University of Santo Tomas, Department of Radiation

Oncology, Manila, Philippines

4

MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Radiation

Oncology, Houston, USA

Purpose or Objective

To fully automate radiotherapy planning for cervical

cancer (4-field box treatments) and head/neck cancer

(VMAT/IMRT).

Material and Methods

We are using a combination of in-house software, Eclipse

Treatment Planning System, and Mobius 3D to create and

validate radiotherapy plans. Most planning tasks have

been automated using a primary algorithm for the

treatment plan, and a secondary independent algorithm

to verify the primary algorithm.

The first step is to automatically determine the external

body surface and isocenter (based on radiopaque markers

in a 3-point setup) using two independent techniques.

For H/N cases, the radiation oncologist manually

delineates the GTV. Normal tissues (parotids, cord,

brainstem, lung, eyes, mandible, cochlea, brain), cervical

neck nodes (levels II-IV, IB-V or IA-V) and retropharyngeal

nodes are automatically delineated using an in-house

multi-atlas segmentation tool. The RapidPlan tool

(Eclipse) is used to create a VMAT plan.

For 4-field box cervical cancer treatments, the field

apertures (jaw and MLC positions) are automatically

calculated based on bony anatomy using two techniques:

The primary technique uses atlas-based segmentation of

bony anatomy, and then calculates apertures based on the

projection of these bones to each beam’s-eye-view. The

secondary technique deformably registers atlas DRRs to

the patient’s DRR for each beam, then uses the

deformation matrix to deform atlas blocks (MLC positions)

to the patient’s DRR. Relative beam weighting is

determined based on a least-squares fit, minimizing

heterogeneity in the treatment volume.

Final dose distributions are automatically sent to Mobius

for secondary dose calculation.

Results

Primary and secondary techniques for identifying the body

surface agreed within 1.0mm/0.99 (mean distance to

agreement/average DICE coefficient). Primary and

secondary techniques for determining isocenter agreed

within 3mm. H/N normal tissue and lymph node

segmentation was evaluated by a radiation oncologist (128

patients), and found to be acceptable for all structures,

except for esophagus and cochlea and in situations where

the head position was non-standard. The figure below

shows a fully automated plan including contours and

optimized doses.

A radiation oncologist found 96% of cervical cancer beam

apertures were clinically acceptable, with all failures

caused by a slight error in the position of the superior

border. The primary and secondary aperture calculations

agreed with average DICE and mean absolute distance of

0.93 and 5.5mm, respectively. An example is shown

below. Automated beam weighting reduced hotspots by

1.5% on average.

Conclusion

Normal tissue segmentation for head/neck cancer patients

and determination of the jaw/MLC for cervical cancer

patients are very successful. Both have been introduced

into use in our clinic. Next steps include full evaluation of

the resulting dose distributions, and assessing the use of

these techniques for a prototype linac with flattening-

filter-free beam and novel MLC design.

PO-0821 Automatic re-planning of VMAT plans in

prostate and HN patients using constrained optimization

L. Künzel

1

, O. Dohm

2

, M. Alber

3

, D. Thorwarth

1

1

University Hospital Tübingen Eberhard Karls University

Tübingen, Section for Biomedical Physics, Tübingen,

Germany

2

University Hospital Tübingen Eberhard Karls University

Tübingen, Radiation Oncology Division of Medical

Physics, Tübingen, Germany