Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  474 / 1096 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 474 / 1096 Next Page
Page Background

S459

ESTRO 36

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Material and Methods

42 patients with inoperable, stage II-III NSCLC were

treated with (chemo)radiotherapy as part of the

(NCT01024829) PET-boost trial. Patients received

escalated doses (≥ 72 Gy) in 24 fractions consisting of

either a homogenous boost to the PTV, or an

inhomogeneous boost to FDG avid (≥50% SUV

max

) areas.

Patients whom could not be boosted received 66 Gy in 24

fractions. All patients received an FDG PET/CT scan 3

months post-treatment, which was registered to the

planning CT. The lung contours minus the GTV were

compared between the SUV on FDG PET and the planning

CT dose. The planning CT dose was adjusted to equivalent

doses in 2 Gy fractions, assuming an α/β = 3 Gy, and then

binned per 5 Gy increments. The SUV was averaged over

all patients per dose bin and a dose response sigmoid was

fit (SUV vs Gy ) to determine upper and lower asymptotes,

as well as the EC50. The linear portion of the sigmoid fit

(17.6%-82.4% asymptotes difference) was applied to

individual patients for linear fitting, yielding the

correlation coefficient and the SUV response to an

increase in dose (slope). All values were reported as

median[interquartile range (IQR)]. All fits were considered

significant with an alpha of 0.05.

Results

A positive relationship was found between SUV and post-

treatment dose. A sample patient with post-treatment

grade 1 pneumonitis is shown in figure 1. The sigmoidal fit

(figure 2) over all patients was significant (chi-squared =

0.01) with an EC50 at 39 Gy, and lower and upper

asymptotes at 0.60 SUV and 1.31 SUV, respectively. The

linear portion of the sigmoidal fit (15- 60 Gy) was found to

be significantly (p ≤ 0.05), highly linear in individual

patients with a median correlation coefficient of

0.93[0.79-0.97]. Four patients did not have significant

linear fits (p-values ranging from 0.05 to 0.13). The

median SUV response per increase in dose (slope) was

heterogeneous with a median of 0.0083[0.005-0.018]

SUV/Gy, implying a 55 Gy to 200 Gy increase needed per

SUV increase within the IQR.

Conclusion

Strong linear and sigmoidal relationships were found

between post-treatment SUV and planned dose. These

results suggest that increasing dose leads to a highly linear

increase of lung damage up to a certain threshold (60 Gy),

before adopting an asymptotic relationship. Patient

response in the linear fitting was heterogeneous with a

greater than 3 fold difference found in the IQR. These

findings may aid in post-treatment response assessment

and toxicity modeling in NSCLC patients undergoing

escalated dosing regimens.

PO-0848 Predictors of patient-reported incontinence

after prostate cancer RT: results from a cohort study

C. Cozzarini

1

, N. Bedini

2

, E. Garibaldi

3

, D. Balestrini

4

, P.

Franco

5

, G. Girelli

6

, I. Improta

7

, F. Palorini

8

, V.

Vavassori

9

, T. Rancati

8

, R. Valdagni

2,8

, C. Fiorino

7

1

San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Radiotherapy, Milano,

Italy

2

Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori,

Radiation Oncology 1, Milano, Italy

3

Istituto di Candiolo- Fondazione del Piemonte per

l'Oncologia IRCCS, Radiotherapy, Candiolo, Italy

4

Ospedale Bellaria, Radiotherapy, Bologna, Italy

5

Ospedale Regionale U.Parini-AUSL Valle d’Aosta,

Radiotherapy, Aosta, Italy

6

Ospedale ASL9, Radiotherapy, Ivrea, Italy

7

San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Medical Physics,

Milano, Italy

8

Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori,

Prostate Cancer Program, Milano, Italy

9

Cliniche Gavazzeni-Humanitas, Radiotherapy, Bergamo,

Italy

Purpose or Objective

To assess clinical and dose factors affecting the incidence

of patient-reported urinary incontinence (INC) at three

years after radical radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer

of a large group of patients enrolled in a prospective,

multi-centric trial in the period 2010-2014.

Material and Methods

Enrolled patients were treated in seven Institutions at

different prescribed doses with conventional (74-80 Gy at

1.8-2 Gy/fr, CONV) or moderately hypo-fractionated RT

(65-75.2 Gy at 2.2-2.7 Gy/fr, HYPO) in 5 fractions/week.

Several clinical factors were collected for each patient:

comorbidities, drugs, hormone therapies, previous

surgeries, smoking, alcohol, age, and body mass index. In

addition, the prescribed 2Gy equivalent dose (EQD2) was

considered by applying an alpha-beta ratio of 0.8, 3 and

5Gy, according to values recently reported in the

literature. INC was evaluated through the International

Consultation on Incontinence Modular Questionnaire short

form (ICIQ) filled in by the patients at start/end of RT and

every 6 months until 5 years of follow up. In the current

analysis, patients with ICIQ available at 30 and/or 36

months were considered (n=298;); the incidence of INC at

3 years was defined as the occurrence of an ICIQ value >12

at least once between 6 and 36 months. Univariable and

backward multivariable logistic analyses were performed

to build a predictive model.

Results

In total, 298 patients had the required minimum follow-

up; patients with baseline ICIQ>12 (n=3) were excluded

restricting the analysis to 295 patients (CONV: 149; HYPO:

146, 86% treated with IMRT). The median number per

patients of completed questionnaires was 5 (range: 2-6):

the incidence of ICIQ>12 was 5.1% (n=15) with a

prevalence at 30/36 months equal to 4.1%. Main predictors

at univariable analysis were age (p=0.01,OR=1.19),

baseline ICIQ>0 (p=0.056, OR=2.9), previous TURP

(p=0.04, OR=3.8) and EQD2 (p=0.003-0.02, OR=1.12-1.17

depending on alpha-beta). EQD2 calculated with alpha-

beta=0.8Gy showed the best performances in terms of

calibration plot and p-value and was included in the multi-

variable analysis. Final results suggested a two-variable

model including EQD2 (p=0.005,OR=1.13; 95%CI:1.04-1.24)

and age (p=0.011,OR=1.19; 95%CI:1.04-1.37); the model

showed good performances in terms of goodness of fit