Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  475 / 1096 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 475 / 1096 Next Page
Page Background

S460

ESTRO 36

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

(H&L test, p=0.55) and calibration plot (slope:1.02,

R

2

=0.92). In Figure, the risk of 3-year INC vs EQD2 (alpha-

beta=0.8Gy) is shown with the calibration plot of the final

two-variable model. The validity of the model was

confirmed in the HYPO subgroup.

Conclusion

The incidence of patient-reported 3-year INC after high-

dose RT for prostate cancer dramatically depends on the

prescribed dose (EQD2) and, secondarily, on the age of

patients. A previously suggested low alpha-beta value

(0.8Gy) for late INC resulted in a significantly better

calibrated model, consistently with a high sensitivity of

late I NC to fractionation.

PO-0849 Trismus after chemoradiation in head & neck

cancer: relation with medial pterygoid and masseter

dose

O. Hamming-Vrieze

1

, S. Kraaijenga

2

, S. Verheijen

1

, M.

Jonker

1

, L. Van der Molen

2

, J. Van de Kamer

1

, M. Van de

Brekel

2

, W. Heemsbergen

1

1

Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek

Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, The

Netherlands

2

Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek

Hospital, Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam, The

Netherlands

Purpose or Objective

Reduced maximal mouth opening (MMO) is a serious side

effect that can occur after chemoradiation (CRT) in head

& neck patients. Recent studies showed dose-effect

relationships with both the ipsilateral masseter muscle

(iMM) and the ipsilateral medial pterygoid muscle (iMPM).

It is unclear whether these muscles should be regarded as

a joined Organ at Risk or separately. The aim of our study

was to calculate and compare separate dose-effect

relationships between trismus and 1) the dose to the iMM

and 2) iMPM dose, taking into account the baseline MMO.

Material and Methods

For 83 patients, participating in an exercise program to

preserve oral function in the period 2008 - 2014, pre- and

post-RT (6 weeks) MMO measurements were available.

Treated tumors were mainly located in the oropharynx

(40%) and hypopharynx (31%). All patients received

concomitant radiotherapy (35x2Gy) via IMRT or VMAT

technique with cisplatin 100mg/m

2

at day 1,22 and 43.

Pathological MMO (trismus) was set at ≤35mm as a

functional cut-off. Exclusion criteria were trismus at

baseline and gross tumor infiltration of the iMM or iMPM

on planning CT. The muscles were retrospectively

delineated. A logistic regression with bootstrapping

resampling technique (n=2000) was applied to calculate

model parameters. Dose-volume parameters (mean-,

absolute- and relative dose) were calculated in 5 Gy steps.

Results

MMO showed a large range (

Fig A

) with 14 trismus cases

(17%) post-RT. Baseline MMO was a significant predictor

for trismus (p=0.005) with an optimal cutoff at 45mm.

Women more often had a baseline MMO ≤ 45 (65%)

compared to men (37%, p=0.02) and therefore had a higher

trismus risk (30% vs 12%, p=0.04). Mean doses of the iMPM

and iMM correlated significantly (

Fig B,

Pearson

coefficient 0.83, p<0.001) with a mean iMPM dose of

53.3Gy versus 30.3Gy for iMM (p<0.001). In general, dose

parameters of the iMPM showed superior fits (lowest -2 Log

Likelihoods, lowest p values, better goodness-of-fit

statistics) compared to iMM; differences were not

statistically significant. The best fit for the iMPM was with

mean dose (odds ratio 1.165, p<0.001); for iMM mean dose

was most predictive as well (odds ratio 1.070, p=0.002).

Fig C&D

shows the dose-response for iMPM and iMM for the

≤45mm and >45mm subgroups. Best fit for dose volume

parameters was for the percentage receiving ≥65Gy

(iMPM, p=0.001) and the percentage receiving ≥40Gy (iMM,

p=0.003).

Conclusion

We observed that both the iMPM and the iMM dose are

predictive for trismus with a better dose-response fit for