Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  507 / 1096 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 507 / 1096 Next Page
Page Background

S492

ESTRO 36

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

in terms of low contrast visibility. This limits the

application of CBCT mainly to patient setup based on high

contrast structures. We address these limitations by

applying advanced preprocessing and reconstruction

algorithms to improve patient setup and facilitate

advanced applications like adaptive radiotherapy.

Material and Methods

The

commercially

available

TrueBeam

CBCT

reconstruction pipeline removes scatter usi ng a kernel-

based correction followed by filtered bac k-projection-

based reconstruction (FDK). These reconstruction n

pipeline steps are replaced by a physics-based scatter

correction (pelvis only) and an iterative reconstruction.

We use statistical reconstruction that takes the Poisson

distribution of quantum noise into account, an d applies

an edge preserving image regularization. The advanced

scatter correction is based on a finite-ele ment solver

(AcurosCTS) to model the behavior of photons as they pass

(and scatter) through the object. Both algorit hms have

been implemented on a GPU cluster pla tform, and

algorithmic acceleration techniques are utilized to

achieve clinically acceptable reconstruction times. The

image quality improvements have been an alyzed on

TrueBeam kV imaging system phantom scans, as well as

on daily CBCT scans of head/neck and prostate cancer

patients acquired for image-guided localization.

Results

Artifacts in head/neck FDK reconstructions (Fig . 1) e.g.

resulting from photon starvation in the shoulder region or

cone-beam are highly reduced in the iterative

reconstructions. The iterative reconstruction s show

enhanced soft tissue definition providing better cl arity for

boundary definition (see the level 2 lymph node located in

the contoured region of the axial view, Fig. 1). The

advanced scatter correction applied for pelvis scans

removes residual scatter artifacts, increasing the mean

homogeneity from 78.2 HU ± 18.0 HU to 20.9 HU ± 10.9 HU

within the bladder region of 9 daily CBCT scans of typical

prostate patients. Iterative reconstruction provides

further benefit by reducing image noise as well as

eliminating streak and cone-beam artifacts, thereby

significantly improving soft-tissue visualization, as noted

in the clinical pelvis CBCT scan (Fig. 2). The noise level

was reduced to 45% of the original value.

Conclusion

Statistical reconstruction in combination with advanced

scatter correction substantially improves CBCT image

quality by enabling removal of artifacts caused by

remaining scatter, projection noise, photon starvation,

and cone-beam angle. These artifact reductions improve

soft tissue definition that is necessary for accurate

visualization, contouring, dose calculation, and

deformable image registration in clinical practice. The

presented improvements are expected to facilitate soft

tissue-based patient setup. Promise has been

demonstrated for new applications, such as adaptive

radiotherapy.

PO-0894 Comparing the spatial integrity of 7T and 3T

MR images for image-guided radiotherapy of brain

tumors

J. Peerlings

1,2

, I. Compter

1

, F.M. Janssen

1

, C.J. Wiggins

3

,

F.M. Mottaghy

2,4

, P. Lambin

1

, A.L. Hoffmann

1,5,6,7

1

Maastricht University Medical Center+- GROW - School

for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Department of

Radiation Oncology - MAASTRO, Maastricht, The

Netherlands

2

Maastricht University Medical Center+, Department of

Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht, The

Netherlands

3

Maastricht Brain Imaging Center - Scannexus, Maastricht

University, Maastricht, The Netherlands

4

University Hospital RWTH Aachen University,

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Aachen, Germany

5

University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus at the Technische

Universität Dresden, Department of Radiotherapy,

Dresden, Germany

6

OncoRay, National Center for Radiation Research in