Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  532 / 1096 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 532 / 1096 Next Page
Page Background

S517

ESTRO 36

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

of this phenomenon, encouraging them to adhere to

appropriate PSA surveillance and avoiding unnecessary

and repetitive PSA measurements, biopsies and premature

or inappropriate initiation of salvage therapy during PSAb.

Poster: Brachytherapy: Gynaecolgy

PO-0933 Urethral dose in cervical image guided

brachytherapy

K. MacLennan

1

, M. Zahra

2

, W. Keough

2

1

NHS Lothian, ST6, Edinburgh, United Kingdom

2

NHS Lothian, Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Edinburgh,

United Kingdom

Purpose or Objective

Urethral dose is not currently included in the

recommendations for the dose constraints for organs at

risk (OARs). However, combined external beam and HDR

cervical brachytherapy can result in significant urinary

toxicity. We investigated the urethral dosimetry for

patients treated with HDR brachytherapy.

Material and Methods

Retrospective audit of 117 patients undergoing cervical

brachytherapy for cervical cancer in the Edinburgh Cancer

Centre between 2010-2015. Patients were treated with

45Gy/25 fractions EBRT followed by 3 fractions of CT-

guided HDR brachytherapy with a ring and tandem aiming

for D90 between 80-85Gy. The urethra and peri-urethral

tissues were retrospectively contoured 1cm inferiorly from

bladder neck or to the axial slice corresponding to the

metal connector of ring and tandem device (whichever

most inferior). Dose volume histograms were used to

determine the urethral D2cc and expressed as 2Gy

equivalent (EQD2) using an a/b ratio of 3. A combined

EQD2 dose for external beam and HDR treatment was

calculated. Data was also collected on the length and

angle of the tandem applicator and a paired T-test with

0.05 significance level was used to assess the effect of the

angle or tandem length on the urethral dose.

Results

117 patients aged 21-84. A 30º applicator angle was used

in 12% cases, 45º in 67%, 60º in 21% patients. A 6 cm

applicator was used in 68% patients; 4cm in 32% patients.7

patients had a single fraction of HDR brachytherapy and

converted to a CT planned phase 2 with external beam

radiotherapy. Excluding the phase 2 patients, median

combined dose to HRCTV was 84.03 Gy and to the urethral

d2cc was 50.7Gy (range: 44.8- 173.9Gy)

Comparing the maximum EQD2 to 2cm

3

urethra from the

fractionated treatment by applicator angle and length;

Tandem

Applicator

Angle

30º Tandem

45º Tandem

60º Tandem

Maximum

EQD2 per

fraction to

2cm

3

urethra

Median 1.52 Gy

(range 0.94-4.90)

Median 3.63 Gy

(range 0.70-

60.98)

Median

3.262 Gy

(range 0.76-

23.67)

Total EQD2

2cm

3

urethra 3

fractions HDR

BT

Median 3.59 Gy

(range 1.59-12.30)

Median 8.07 Gy

(range 1.82-

130.75)

Median 6.89

Gy

(range 2.14-

52.81)

T test for angle (30º vs 45º, 45º vs 60º and 60º vs 45º)

suggested a difference in urethral dose using a

30º applicator, with a tendency for lower urethral D2cc

with a 30º angle. (30 vs 45 p = 0.002 and 30 vs 60 p =

0.04).

There was no difference in urethral dose per HDR

fraction according to applicator length (t-test, p = 0.54).

Conclusion

There is little existing data guiding urethral dose

constraint but study in peri-urethral cancer has

demonstrated a higher risk of urethral toxicity in patients

with a urethral EQD2 of >85Gy. Our median EQD2 was

below this level but with a wide range, indicating the

degree of adaptation using image guidance. Given the

poor correlation of applicator angle and length with dose

to OARs choice of applicator should remain dictated by the

patients’ anatomy.

PO-0934 Brachytherapy as part of the conservative

treatment for primary and recurrent vulvar carcinoma

C. Chargari

1,2

, P. Castelnau-Marchand

1

, A. Escande

1

, I.

Dumas

1

, R. Mazeron

1

, P. Maroun

1

, E. Bentivegna

3

, S.

Gouy

3

, A. Cavalcanti

3

, P. Morice

3

, C. Haie-Meder

1

1

Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Brachytherapy unit-

Radiation oncology, Villejuif, France

2

French Military Health Services Academy, French

Military Health Services Academy, Paris, France

3

Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Department of Surgery,

Villejuif, France

Purpose or Objective

There are only scarce data on the place of brachytherapy

(BT) for treatment of vulvar carcinoma. Our institutional

experience of interstitial BT for vulvar carcinoma patients

is reported.

Material and Methods

Clinical records of patients receiving low-dose rate (LDR)

or pulsed-dose rate (PDR) BT as part of the primary

treatment for primary/recurrent vulvar squamous cell

carcinoma or as part of adjuvant treatment between 2000

and 2015 were included. Patients, tumors and treatments

characteristics as well as clinical outcome were examined.

Results

A total of 26 patients treated with BT were identified. BT

was delivered as part of primary intent treatment for

locally advanced/recurrent cancer in 11 patients, and as

part of adjuvant treatment in 15 patients. Median age at

time of BT was 63 years (range: 41 – 88 years). PDR and

LDR were used in 15 patients and 11 patients,

respectively. BT was performed as a boost to the tumour

bed following EBRT (n=13) or as only irradiation modality

(n=13). Total median dose at the level of primary tumor

was 60 GyEQD2 (range: 55 – 60 GyEQD2). With mean

follow-up of 41 months (range: 5 months – 11.3 years), 11

patients experienced tumour relapse. Ten patients

experienced local relapse as first event, associated with

synchronous extra-vulvar events in 8/10 patients. Three-

year estimated disease-free survival and overall survival

rates were 57% (95%CI: 45–69%) and 81% (95%CI: 72-90%).

All toxicities were grade 2 or less.

Conclusion

Interstitial BT used as part of the primary or adjuvant

treatment of vulvar carcinoma is feasible with a

satisfactory toxicity profile. Prognosis remains however,

dismal, with a high frequency of local and distant failures

in patients with locally advanced tumors.

PO-0935 Modeling to compensate for intra-fractional

bladder dose variations in gynecological brachytherapy

Z. Siavashpour

1

, R. Jaberi

2

, M.R. Aghamiri

1

, C. Kirisits

3

1

Shahid Beheshti University, Medical Radiation

Engineering, Tehran, Iran Islamic Republic of

2

Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Radiotherapy,

Tehran, Iran Islamic Republic of

3

Comprehensive Cancer Center- Medical University of

Vienna, Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology,

Vienna, Austria

Purpose or Objective

Proposing a model to compensate for intra-fractional

bladder dose variations during gynecological (GYN)

brachytherapy.