Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  531 / 1096 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 531 / 1096 Next Page
Page Background

S516

ESTRO 36

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Conclusion

Our study shows an average systematic 16% smaller

prostate volume on TRUS compared to CT. This differs

from the 30 to 50% smaller volumes on TRUS reported in

the literature. This discrepancy is probably due to the

presence of catheters implanted under TRUS guidance in

CT based planning which means that catheters are

inserted under TRUS guidance in both planning modalities.

These catheters act as fiducial markers to delimit the

prostate capsule transversely on CT. The residual 16%

volume variation is largely due to the uncertainty in

identifying the prostate apex. A 2.8 mm isotropic

dosimetric margin should be used in order to treat

comparable volumes in TRUS compared to CT based

planning.

PO-0931 Clinical outcome and quality of life after MRI-

guided HDR boost for prostate cancer.

F. Lakosi

1

, A. Miovecz

1

, G. Antal

1

, J. Pall

2

, D. Nagy

3

, M.

Csima

4

, J. Hadjiev

1

, I. Rep a

1

, G. Toller

1

1

Kaposvar University, Radiotherapy, Kaposva r, Hungary

2

Csolnoky Ferenc Hospital, Radiotherapy, Veszprem,

Hungary

3

Kaposi Mor Teaching Hospital, Urology, Kaposvar,

Hungary

4

Kaposvar University, Faculty of Pedagogy, Kaposvar,

Hungary

Purpose or Objective

To analyze 5-year clinical outcome and quality of life

(QoL) after MR-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy

(HDR-BT) combined with 3D conformal external beam

radiotherapy (3D-EBRT).

Material and Methods

Fifty-two patients with intermediate (IR) (n=22) to high-

risk (HR) (n=30, 18 T3 diseases) localized prostate cancer

were treated with 46-60 Gy of 3D EBRT preceded and/or

followed by a single dose of 8-10 Gy MR-guided HDR-BT.

Template reconstruction, trajectory planning, image

guidance, contouring and treatment planning were

exclusively based on MR images. Ninety-six percent of the

patients received androgen deprivation. Biochemical

relapse–free survival (bRFS, Phoenix definition), local

relapse-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free

survival (DMFS), cancer-specific survival (CCS) and overall

survival (OS) were analyzed actuarially. Morbidity were

scored using CTCAEv4.0, while patients self-reported

urinary and bowel QoL was measured with the Expanded

Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) instrument and

International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at baseline

and at regular intervals up to 6 years.

Results

Median follow-up time was 73 (range:13-103) months. The

crude/5-year actuarial rates of bRFS, LRFS, DMFS, CSS and

OS were 94/97.4 %, 98/100 %, 96/97 %, 100/100 % and

92/91 %, respectively. Two distant failures occurred in HR

group, while one local recurrence in IR group. The main

urinary toxicity was dysuria, which were Gr. 2 in 24/52

cases, including 9 patients with alfa blocker use at

baseline. There were 3 urinary strictures including one Gr.

3 event. Late GI morbidity was mild, representing Gr. 1

diarrhea (10/51), Gr. 1 urgency (9/51), Gr. 2 proctitis

(1/52) and Gr. 2 fecal incontinence (1/52), respectively.

A significant decline in urinary domain was observed

within the first 3 months, which mostly recovered by 6

months, thereafter declined progressively (p>0.05) and

remained stable from 4th years follow up (p>0.05)

(Figure). A similar trend was seen for bowel QoL, where a

significant decline occured within the first 3 months that

subsequently returned to nearly baseline level within 6

months, however, in contrast to urinary functions

remained stable over time (p>0.05). The evolution of IPPS

scores showed the same pattern as EPIC urinary scores.

Conclusion

Five-year clinical outcome of MR-guided HDR-BT boost is

encouraging, providing excellent disease control and lack

of serious late side effects. A slight decline in long-term

urinary QoL was observed.

PO-0932 Prostate-specific Antigen bounce in patients

treated with 125I prostate brachytherapy: Keep calm

A. Pires

1

, D. Moreira

1

, C. Castro

1

, A. Oliveira

1

, J.

Oliveira

2

, L. Trigo

3

1

Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto Francisco

Gentil- EPE, Radioncology, Porto, Portugal

2

Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto Francisco

Gentil- EPE, Urology, Porto, Portugal

3

Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto Francisco

Gentil- EPE, Brachytherapy, Porto, Portugal

Purpose or Objective

Permanent low-dose-rate brachytherapy (BT) with

125

I is

an established curative modality for the treatment of

localized prostate cancer. After treatment, prostate-

specific antigen (PSA) level may fluctuate and temporarily

increase without a clear reason. This phenomenon is

called “PSA bounce” (PSAb) and often causes anxiety in

patient and physician. Our aim was to analyse the kinetics

of PSA in our patients and the association between PSA

bounce and the long term disease outcome after prostate

BT with

125

I.

Material and Methods

We analysed 134 patients treated with

125

I implantation

monotherapy between 2004 and 2006 in a single

institution. All patients had tumour stage T1-T2cN0M0,

Gleason score ≤ 7 and follow-up time was ≥ 9 years.

Patients who received neo-adjuvant hormone

therapy were excluded. PSAb was defined as a rise

beyound 0.2 ng/ml the initial PSA nadir with a subsequent

decline to or below the initial nadir without treatment.

Biochemical failure (BF) was determined using the Phoenix

definition (nadir +2 ng/mL). Associations between PSAb

and the various pre and post-treatment factors were

assessed with logistic regression analysis, the association

between a PSAb and BF was examined with the

log-rank

test and the

Mann-Whitney U

test was applied to test for

difference in the time to a PSA rise between PSAb and BF

patients.

Results

PSAb occurred in 53 (39,8%) patients with a median time

to bounce of 18,8 months. Only 7 (13,2%) patients with

PSAb developed BF, in contrast to 12 (15%) patients

without previous bounce (p = 0,084). Among the pre and

post-treatment factors, only younger age predicted a PSAb

on a multivariate analysis (p = 0.049). PSA levels during

the bounce reached levels as high as 8,85 ng/mL in this

cohort. BF occurred in 19 patients (14,4%). The 9-year

overall survival rate was 83,6%, the 9-year disease-specific

survival was 95,8% and the rate of survival at 9-year

freedom from BF was higher than 90%.

Conclusion

PSAb is a common finding in our population and is

associated with a lower rate of subsequent BF. Patients

should be advised for the eventual PSAb after

permanent

125

I prostate BT. Those who experience a PSAb

are more likely to be younger. The physicians involved in

patients follow-up after prostate BT should also be aware