Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  526 / 1096 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 526 / 1096 Next Page
Page Background

S511

ESTRO 36

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Image-guided radiation therapy using MV imaging can be

incorporated into the treatment plan to give clinically

acceptable dose distributions. Dose to normal tissues is

increased, however, and depends on the imaging

technique, it is important to select the technique which

minimizes normal tissue dose while providing sufficient

image quality for patient setup.

Poster: Brachytherapy: Breast

PO-0922 Late toxicity and cosmetic outcome following

APBI using interstitial multicatheter HDR brachytherapy

T. Soror

1,2

, G. Kovács

2

, N. Seibold

2

, C. Melchert

2

, K.

Baumann

3

, E. Wenzel

4

, S. Stojanovic-Rundic

5

1

National Cancer Institute, Radiation Oncology

Department, Cairo, Egypt

2

Interdisciplinary Brachytherapy Unit, University of

Luebeck/UKSH-CL- Germany, Lübeck, Germany

3

Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of

Luebeck/UKSH-CL- Germany, Lübeck, Germany

4

Clinic for Plastic Surgery, University of Luebeck/UKSH-

CL- Germany, Lübeck, Germany

5

5Institute for Oncology and Radiology IORS, Radiation

Oncology Department, Belgrad, Serbia

Purpose or Objective

Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) has became a

valid option in treating patients with early stage breast

cancer following breast conservation surgery (BCS). This

work reports on the late toxicity and the cosmetic

outcome following APBI using interstitial multicatheter

HDR intensity modulated brachytherapy (HDR-IMBT).

Material and Methods

Between 2006 and 2014, 114 patients received adjuvant

APBI using interstitial multicatheter HDR-IMBT. Late

toxicities were reported according to both the

RTOG/EORTC score and the LENT/SOMA score. Cosmetic

changes were documented by taking digital photographs

before the APBI and during each follow-up visit. For each

patient, we assessed two photographs, the first was taken

after surgery and before APBI (baseline image), and the

second at the last available follow-up visit. The cosmesis

was assessed through a multidisciplinary team using the

Harvard breast cosmesis scale. The clinical and the

dosimetric parameters were investigated for any potential

correlations with the cosmetic results.

Results

The median follow-up period was 3.5 years (range 0.6 –

8.5). Late skin/soft tissue toxicities at the last follow-up

visit are listed in Table1. Ten patients had grade-3 toxicity

(8.8%) and no patients showed grade-4 toxicity. The most

common toxicities were fibrosis (56.2% by LENT/SOMA

score, and 47.4% by RTOG/EORTC score) followed by pain

(42.1%).

The final cosmetic scores were 81.5% excellent/good and

18.5% fair/poor. Comparing both the baseline and the last

follow-up cosmetic scores, 59.6% of the patients had the

same score, 36% had a better final score, and 4.4% had a

worse final score. Patient age, tumor location, tumor size,

number of catheters, V100 (volume receiving 100% of the

prescription dose), V150 (volume receiving 150% of the

prescription dose), DNR (dose non-uniformity ratio), and

skin D

max

(maximum skin dose) were correlated with the

final cosmetic scores and with the change in cosmetic

scores between both photographs. Only lower DNR values

(0.3 vs 0.26; p=0.009) were significantly associated with

improved cosmetic outcome vs same/worse cosmetic

outcome.

Conclusion

APBI using interstitial multicatheter HDR-IMBT adjuvant to

BCS results in acceptable rates of late toxicity and

cosmetic outcome. Deterioration in the breast cosmetic

scores occurs in less than 5% of the patients. The final

breast cosmetic outcome seems to be mainly influenced

by the cosmetic result of the surgery. Lower DNR value is

significantly associated with better cosmetic outcome.

PO-0923 Does catheter entry-exit dosimetry correlate

with grade of skin marks after breast brachytherapy?

T. Wadasadawala

1

, R. Krishnamurthy

1

, U. Gayake

1

, R.

Phurailatpam

1

, S. Paul

1

, R. Sarin

1

1

Actrec-Tata Memorial Centre, Radiation Oncology, Navi

Mumbai, India

Purpose or Objective

Grade of post-implant skin marks after multi-cathetar

interstitial brachytherapy (MIB) is an important factor in

determining cosmesis. This study intends to establish the

correlation if any between catheter entry-exit (E-E)

dosimetry and grade of skin marks at the E-E sites.

Material and Methods

Visibility of the post implant E-E catheter marks was noted

plane-wise for 25 patients (173 planes) with minimum 18

months follow-up post implant. All patients were treated

with 34 Gy in 10 fractions, twice a day at minimum 6 hours

apart. These were graded as 'not visible', 'faint', 'clear' and

'prominent'. Dose received by the skin at the E-E sites was

calculated from the treated plans which were retrieved

from the Oncentra treatment planning system (Figure 1).

Dose maximum (Dmax) for each plane was determined

meticulously. Closest distance of each E-E point in each

plane from the respective first or last dwell position,

clinical target volume (CTV) and the reference isodose

(85%) was measured. Statistical analysis was done in IBM

SPSS version 21. Correlation between quality of implant

marks and dosimetric parameters was analyzed using

Spearman’s co-efficient (single tailed). Chi square test

was done between the quality of marks and plane Dmax as

well as closest distances each from CTV, prescription

isodose and first or last dwell position. ROC curve was used

to determine dose constraints.