Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  786 / 1096 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 786 / 1096 Next Page
Page Background

S770

ESTRO 36

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Material and Methods

Polymer gels were obtained from MGS Research Inc

(Madison, CT) in custom-designed glass cylinders of 4 cm

height and 5 cm diameter. Irradiations were delivered

with a non-clinical MR-linac pilot system (MR-Linac, Elekta

AB, Stockholm) that combined a 1.5 T MR scanner with a

7 MV linac. Two dosimeters were positioned separately in

a phantom with their midplanes at isocenter distance. A

total of 750 MU (~5 Gy) was delivered with 3x3 cm² fields

at three gantry positions. The gantry was positioned at 0

,

90

, and 180

for the first irradiation and at 0

, 270

, and

180

for the second irradiation. All four cardinal angles

weren’t feasible due an asymmetric phantom design.

MR images across the entire volume of the dosimeter were

acquired with a 3T GE scanner using a 2D spin echo

sequence (TR = 1000 ms, TE = 10, 20, 60, 100 ms) 24h after

irradiation. Spin-spin relaxation rate (R2) maps were

generated. Both field size and penumbra widths were

calculated on the central slice. R2 maps were

concatenated into a 3D matrix.

The experiment was performed while the magnet of the

MR component (B-field) was turned off and will be

repeated once the B- field is turned back on.

Results

The small fields were captured and resolved within each

dosimeter. The field width measured along the central

cross-plane R2 profile from each dosimeter was 28 mm and

29 mm, respectively. The penumbra widths were 5 mm at

both field edges in each dosimeter. The 3D R2 matrix

visualized the irradiated volume of the dosimeter well.

In order to study the influence of the B-field on the dose

distribution in 3D, the results in the presence and absence

of the MR component (B-field) will be compared and

presented.

Conclusion

Polymer gels offer an excellent means to measure 3D

relative dose distributions delivered with an MR-Linac in a

clinically relevant fashion.

Previous experiments with polymer gels have already

shown that steep dose gradients could be measured when

irradiated with an MR-Linac. The current study encourages

further study of polymer gels for measuring 3D dose

distributions in the presence of B-fields.

EP-1444 Reliable error detection in radiochromic film

dosimetry with optimal density curves and corrections

H. Park

1

, Y. Bae

2

, J. Park

3

, M. Kim

1

, Y. Oh

1

, M. Chun

1

, O.

Noh

1

, O. Cho

1

, J. Lee

2

1

Ajou University Medical Center, Dept. of Radiation

Oncology, Suwon, Korea Republic of

2

Konkuk University Medical Center,

Dept.of

Convergent

Medical Physics and Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Seoul,

Korea Republic of

3

University of Florida, Dept. of Radiation Oncology,

Gainesville, USA

Purpose or Objective

To minimize variation of dosimetric errors caused by

correction methods and to suggest optimal conditions in

gafchromic film dosimetry using a flatbed scanner,

feasible scanning and post analysis procedures were

investigated with impacts on error detection in gamma

analysis.

Material and Methods

When a rectangular piece (5 × 4 cm) of EBT3 film was

placed at a 5 cm depth of the water-equivalent solid water

phantom, doses were delivered to film pieces from 0 cGy

to 20 Gy with every 50 cGy under 500 cGy and 100 cGy

over 500 cGy. To find an optimal sensitometric curve

having a large range of optical density (OD) and linearity

in doses of interest, a set of exposed films was scanned in

a flatbed scanner with different conditions by adjusting

brightness, contrast, and highlight from -50 to 50.

Sensitometric curves of a red and a green channel were

obtained with each scanning condition and used to

compare gamma distributions. In addition, to clarify the

effects of applicable corrections, particularly for light

scattering and non-uniform responses between a film layer

and a panel, dose errors before and after correction were

visualized and quantified. Each effect by sensitometric

curves and correction methods on detection of dose errors

in gamma analysis was evaluated in a square field of 10

cm, a 45° wedged field, and an intensity-modulated field

for prostate cancer.

Results

Both sensitometry curves of the red and the green channel

could reach two times higher OD of 2.2 at 20 Gy and the

gap of OD was gradully more distinguishable over 4 Gy in

scanning with high contrast. The sensitometric curve of

green channel showed differentiated linearity in the dose

range under 2 Gy. The difference in the gradient of OD

brought out maximum 10% difference of gamma passing

rate in both wedged and intensity-modulated fields. The

primary positions of failed points in gamma analysis were

different according to sensitometric curves. When the

optimal sensitometric curve was applied, uniformity

correction caused maximum 8% difference in gamma

passing rate.