Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  96 / 1096 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 96 / 1096 Next Page
Page Background

S83

ESTRO 36

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Conclusion

Despite standardized information and performing

simulation on the treatment machine, anxiety remains an

item that needs specific attention. Even with fraction

duration times of up to 75 minutes, only a single patient

perceived this as being unacceptably long.

OC-0162 Optimizing sequences for MRI-guided

radiotherapy in cranial and head and neck regions

W.W.K. Fung

1

, S.Y. Man

1

, J. Yuan

2

, L.H. FUNG

2

, W.P.

LUK

2

, G. Chiu

1

1

Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Department of

Radiotherapy, Happy Valley, Hong Kong SAR China

2

Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Medical Physics &

Research Department, Happy Valley, Hong Kong SAR

China

Purpose or Objective

MR sequences using parallel acquisition technique (PAT)

with increasing acceleration factors could reduce the scan

time for treatment verification, but with the cost of losing

image quality that could affect verification accuracy. This

study assessed the effect of different PAT factors on image

quality, scan time and fusion accuracy, thus choosing a

sequence which is clinically suitable for MRI-guided RT in

cranial (C) and HN regions.

Material and Methods

Ten healthy volunteers were set up in treatment position

using headrest and immobilization mask on the flat couch

of a 1.5T MRI-simulator (Siemens MAGNETOM Aera). High

resolution isotropic (1.05mm) 3D TSE T1W and T2W MR

sequences were acquired (MR-ref). Based on MR-ref, 11

low-resolution (isotropic 1.4mm) verification sequences

(MR-P

xy

s) were acquired with GRAPPA where acceleration

factors x and y were altered in respectively phase

encoding and slice encoding directions. Effective PAT

factor (PAT-f) equals x times y. Four therapists (2 seniors

& 2 juniors) performed two sets of fusions: MR-ref & MR-

P

xy

s and MR-ref & duplicated MR-ref (control set) for C and

HN region. Shift results (6DOF) were recorded. Survey was

given to observers for scoring the image quality. Logistic

and linear regression were used.

Results

The scan time for MR-ref were 301s and 330s, and for MR-

P

xy

s it ranged from 249s to 49s and 254s to 59s for T1W and

T2W images respectively when PAT-f increased from 3

(MR-P

31

) to 16 (MR-P

44

). Subjective analysis showed that

the scores of all verification series were lower than the

reference and decreased with increasing PAT-f. Image

quality decreased when reducing the scan time (Fig.1).

Significant reduction of image quality (p<0.05) occurred

when PAT-f reached 12 for T1W and 6 for T2W images.

Observers favored T1W over T2W images (p<0.0001).

Scores from senior observers were significantly better

than juniors (p<0.0001).

About 80% of absolute shift errors in all MR-P

xy

s were not

significantly different from MR-ref in all directions. No

specific trend between PAT-f and shift error was observed,

implying fusion accuracy could not be predicted by PAT-f

value. The errors of T2W were significantly smaller than

T1W in almost all of the shifts (p<0.05). Junior observers

performed significantly better than seniors when fusing

T1W images (p<0.05). For treatment verification purpose,

T1W MR-P

42

(88s) and T2W MR-P

22

(173s) were chosen since

they were the fastest sequences with comparable image

quality to MR-ref. However when considering fusion

errors, MR-P

44

for T1W (49s) and T2W (59s) images, with

an even shorter scan time, should be opted instead as its

verification accuracy had no significant difference in most

shift directions from MR-ref (Fig.2) despite significantly

degraded image quality.

Conclusion

The degradation of image quality by increasing PAT-f does

not necessarily affect the fusion accuracy. MR-P

44

with

acceptable verification accuracy and shortest scan time is

therefore proposed for MRI-guided RT in C and HN regions.

OC-0163 Online workflow for the First-in-Man study

on bone metastases at the MRI-linear accelerator

L.T.C. Meijers

1

, S.J. Hoogcarspel

1

, A.N.T.J. Kotte

1

,

C.N.N. Nomden

1

, G.G. Sikkes

1

, I.H. Kiekebosch

1

, E.N.

Groot de

1

, G.H. Bol

1

, B. Asselen van

1

, I.M. Jurgenliemk-

Schulz

1

, L.G.W. Kerkmeijer

1

, B.W. Raaymakers

1

1

UMC Utrecht, Radiotherapy department, Utrecht, The

Netherlands

Purpose or Objective

The first treatment on the MR-Linac in the UMC Utrecht

includes patients with bone metastases, the first-in-man

study. A fast workflow is required since all processes will

be performed in an online setting. The aim of the present

study is to test the feasibility of an online workflow for

these patients at the MR-Linac within a 30 minute time

limit.

Material and Methods

A workflow with offline and online procedures was

developed for the MR-Linac. To test this workflow, the

Alderson phantom was used, a human body shaped

phantom with tissue-equivalent material. The phantom

yields sufficient CT and MR contrast. The offline workflow

included acquisition of a reference CT scan and manual

delineation of the spinal cord and one lumbar vertebra

(vertebra = CTV, PTV-CTV margin = 5 mm). The online

workflow at the MR-Linac, shown in figure 1, included

setup of the patient (= Alderson phantom) and acquisition