Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  967 / 1096 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 967 / 1096 Next Page
Page Background

S951

ESTRO 36

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

6

McGill University Health Centre, Division of Radiation

Oncology, 1001 boul Décarie- Montreal, Canada

Purpose or Objective

Providing patients with access to their medical records

and collecting patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from

them is of interest in modern healthcare. In Radiation

Oncology, no major successes have been reported and the

provision of medical data to patients remains a challenge.

With a patient who is also a computer scientist, a radiation

oncologist and a medical physicist on our team, we set out

to build Opal, a mobile phone app and portal for oncology

patients. Opal will provide patients with:

Appointment schedules

Check-in/call-in for waiting room management

Status of treatment planning/treatment

schedule

Access to personal health information (PHI)—

treatment plan, lab results, medical notes

Just-in-time educational material, specific to

the patient’s diagnosis, treatment and phase of

treatment

Contact information and a messaging system

Tools to complete PRO questionnaires

Maps and hospital information (eg parking)

Patient's committee module—

Patients for

Patients

Material and Methods

We developed a secure and confidential communication

system that incorporates data from our Aria database

(Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA), patient

authentication, encrypted data exchange and a cloud

server (Firebase by Google Inc.) external to the hospital.

Figure 1 provides a schematic of the data flow from Aria

to/from Opal.

Figure 1. Data flow for Opal. Firebase is a real-time cloud

database by Google.

Results

The design, development and debugging of Opal have been

guided in five ways: (1) a literature review to study

existing patient portals, (2) a patient survey, (3) a patient

focus group, (4) a closed beta-release to non-patient

volunteers, and (5) a pilot to engaged patients who will

provide feedback. Figure 2 provides screenshots of the app

that will be released to our pilot group of patients.

Figure 2 screenshots of the app that will be released to

our pilot group of patients in November 2016.

Conclusion

We have developed Opal, a smartphone app and web

portal, for oncology patients at our comprehensive cancer

centre. Opal provides patients with access to their PHI,

appointment schedules, waiting room management,

relevant just-in-time educational material and patient-

reported outcomes

questionnaires.

Development is currently in the closed beta phase with

testing provided by volunteers with fake electronic health

records. We will release the app to a pilot group of

radiation oncology patients in November 20 17, followed

by general release to all radiation oncology patients in

early 2017. Release of the app to all oncology patients is

planned for the spring of 2017.

EP-1731 What can reveal onsite end-to-end audit? The

experience of national dosimetry audit group

I. Koniarova

1

, I. Horakova

1

, V. Dufek

1

1

National Radiation Protection Institute, Department of

Radiotherapy and X-ray Laboratory, Praha, Czech

Republic

Purpose or Objective

National Radiation Protection Institute performs on-site

audits in the Czech Republic. In total, 53 on-site end-to-

end audits for prostate and 16 for H&N/brain radiotherapy

were performed. Prostate case was verified in the national

run for all centres using IMRT in 2013 and repeated for

majority of centres with upgrade/installation of new

linacs in 2014-2016. There was a pilot run with head

phantom in 2016. Majority of results were within

tolerances. All results were analysed to describe the most

interesting findings and the weakest points.

Material and Methods

Absorbed doses with ionisation chambers and plane doses

with EBT3 films were measured in the pelvic or head

phantom. Following aspects can be assessed: unit

calibration, TPS model accuracy for reference field, MLC

accuracy, CT numbers to RED conversion in terms of its

influence to dose, phantom geometrical offset at the

couch, optimisation constraints, radiobiological plan

parameters calculated from DVHs. Anthropomorphic

phantoms (pelvic and head) with benchmark PTVs and

OARs were used. Three sets of audit results were analysed:

prostate audit national run, repeated prostate audit,

H&N/brain audit pilot run. Methodology is applicable to C-

arm linacs, Tomotherapy, Leksell Gamma Knife, and