Previous Page  267 / 298 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 267 / 298 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

JANUARY/FEBRUARY 198)

Notice No. 1181 diversion to the

home market could be allowed with

the prior consent of the Revenue

Commissioners on payment of the

appropriate duty chargeable and

subject to such conditions as the

Revenue might see fit to impose.

Under Clause 14 of the Appendix to

the said Notice an application for

permission to divert goods to the

home market had to be made in

writing to the Revenue. The Plaintiff

did not make any such application

and did not pay the customs duties

before selling on the home market. It

was argued on behalf of the Plaintiff

that none of those provisions created

a charge on the goods.

On behalf of the Defendant (the

Revenue) reference was made to

A.G.

v.

Thornton

(1824) 13 Price 805, in

which an auctioneer who, after an

ambassador's term of office had

expired, sold on behalf of the

ambassador dutiable goods which

had been imported during the

ambassador's term of office free of

duty on diplomatic exemption, was

held to be liable for the duty which

became payable when the goods

ceased to have the benefit of the

diplomatic exemption by reason of

the sale.

HELD (per McWilliam J.)

(1) That the Revenue were entitled

to be paid the duties out of the

proceeds of sale of the goods in

priority to everyone else.

(2) That the goods became liable to

duty as soon as they were put up for

sale in Ireland and, under Clause 14

of the Appendix to Notice 1181, they

could not lawfully be put up for sale

in Ireland without the consent of the

Revenue and on payment of the

appropriate duties.

(3) That it was the duty of the

Plaintiff to ascertain the position

before he sold the goods as it had

been the duty of the auctioneer in

A.G. v. Thornton

(supra), and that if

the proper steps had been taken the

duties should have been paid before

the goods were sold. The Plaintiff, or

the Bank, could not be permitted to

benefit from an irregular dealing with

the goods for which dealing the

Plaintiff was responsible.

Alex Spain v. The Revenue

Commissioners — High Court (per

McWilliam J.) - 12 February 1980

— unreported.

Deposit

Servicefor

Solicitors

Irish Intercontinental Bank otters you

a Depos it Service for amounts of over

IR£5,(XX) at excellent interest rates.

Rates are offered for Demand,

Not i ce, or Fixed Period Deposits and are

established to afford maximum advantage to

the Depositor of current trends in interest

rates.

Irish Intercontinental Bank is a

subsidiary of Kredietbank N.V., Brussels one

of the leading banks in Europe.

Irish Intercontinental Bank is an

approved bank under Solicitors Accounts

Regulations and is an Authorised Trustee

Investment.

i i

i s

For to-day's Rates

contact

Frank Cafferty

IRISH INTERCONTINENTAL

BANK LIMITED

91 Mcrrion Square, Dublin 2. Iel: (01) 760291. Telex: 25781 and 31658.

Summaries of judgments prepared by John F. Buckley and Hugh M. Fitzpatrick. Edited by Michael V. O'Mahony

IV