Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  464-465 / 1248 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 464-465 / 1248 Next Page
Page Background

Expected Gas Sourcing

LNG (LNG), The pipeline will be fed with regasified LNG from the floating unit (LNG-N-062) -hence it means various sources.

Comments about the Third-Party Access Regime

It is not planned to run a formal Market Test as the Project has not applied for a TPA Exemption and Project's commercial viability will be determined by the success of the

negotiations with potential gas offtakers and/or interested LNG suppliers who have interest in using the infrastructure.

Benefits

Main Driver

Market Demand

Main Driver Explanation

Main drivers: 1. Expressed requirement for diversification of supply sources and routes for SEE markets (Bulgaria, Serbia, FYROM, Romania, Hungary)

creates market / demand opportunities for the project 2. Regional demand growth

Benefit Description

LNG terminal in northern Greece will: Secure new natural gas quantities for the supply of the Greek and the SE European markets, hence enhancing the

security of supply of these markets. Diversify the supply sources and routes in particular with regards to markets with limited supply options (Bulgaria,

Serbia, Romania, FYROM, Hungary, Ukraine) and to this extent lift existing isolation with an aim to reduce dependency on Russian gas while provide access

for new gas findings in the East Med basin to the markets of SEE. Support the South Corridor project(s) by providing alternative/additional supply

quantities when/if required and the interoperability of systems and the creation of a regional gas trading hub. The Project technical design will include

provision for LNG-reloading ability for the purpose of supporting LNG bunkering activities or regional distribution of LNG to remote island locations for

power generation and other industrial and commercial activities.

Delay Explanation

Delays in permitting phase: competent authorities delayed in issuing the required licenses. In the case of Access to shore, seabed & sea area,

there was a delay of 9 months in order to decide how the existing legislation would apply specifically to the Project. In the case of issuance of

the Installation Act & Installation license, the main delay was due to the requirement for the introduction of a legislative change necessary to

grant the RoW for the onshore pipeline. Other reasons: complex economic & political situation in Greece, in particular, in the 2H2015 (e.g.

capital controls). Also, GASTRADE entered into discussions with Public Gas Corporation of Greece (DEPA) for the participation of the later in the

Project. (The EC was duly informed on this since 06/2015). However, the finalization of DEPA's participation in the Project was delayed due to

political developments in Greece and administrative changes with DEPA. This caused delay in execution of FEED & reaching FID.

Barriers

Barrier Type

Description

Regulatory

If tariff levels for the Project do not enjoy the same regulatory regime as the one applied for other competitive regulated infrastructures in the area, then

the Project will become commercially unattractive to potential regional offtakers and therefore financially not viable.

Permit Granting

See above. Delays in Permit granting have led to delays in Project implementation.

Political

No political barriers. On the contrary, there is clear and declared Political support for the Project from the impacted Member States and in particular from

the governments of Greece and Bulgaria. Political stability in the region of the Project's direct influence will support commercial viability of the Project.

Generated by ENTSOG PDWS on 10/10/2016 05:00:19 PM

Page 229 of 620

Current TYNDP : TYNDP 2017 - Annex A