Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  856-857 / 1248 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 856-857 / 1248 Next Page
Page Background

Time Schedule

Grant Obtention Date

Delay Since Last TYNDP

N/A

Delay Explanation

PCI Details

PCI Benefits

Project changes the capability to transmit gas across the borders of the member states concerned by at least 10%, compared to the situation

prior to the commissioning of the project, Project concerns investment in reverse flow capacity

General Criteria Fulfilled

Yes

Specific Criteria Fulfilled

Competition, Market Integration, Security of Supply, Sustainability

Specific Criteria Fulfilled Comments

Pipelines and Compressor Stations

Pipeline Section

Pipeline Comment

Diameter (mm) Length (km) Compressor Power (MW)

CS Gustorzyn

1

6

GIPL - Polish section

700

357

Total

357

16

Schedule

Start Date

End Date

Pre-Feasibility

Feasibility

FEED

01/2014

01/2017

Market Test

Permitting

01/2017

Supply Contracts

FID

01/2017

Construction

01/2017

01/2019

Commissioning

2019

2019

NDP and PCI Information

Part of NDP

Yes (Network Development Plan 2016-

2025)

NDP Number

N/A

Currently PCI

Yes (8.5)

CBCA Decision

Yes (2014-08-11)

Market Survey

Open Season(2013-09-21)

Third-Party Access Regime

Considered TPA Regime

Regulated

Considered Tariff Regime

Regulated

Applied for Exemption

No

Exemption Granted

Not Relevant

Exemption in entry direction

0.00%

Exemption in exit direction

0.00%

Generated by ENTSOG PDWS on

30

/1

1

/2016

12

:

19

:19 PM

Page 425 of 620

Current TYNDP : TYNDP 2017 - Annex A

GAZ-SYSTEM encountered a number of problems mainly regarding the extension of CS Rembelszczyzna. These issues concern permitting and environmental

aspects. They significantly undermine the implementation of the project according to the previous time schedule. Due to the significance of the project

GAZ-SYSTEM proposed a new routing of the pipeline in Poland. The reason for changing the routing is to strenghten the engineering and technical aspects of

the project and to commission the project with a shortest possible delay when compared to the implementation of GIPL in the base scenario.