![Show Menu](styles/mobile-menu.png)
![Page Background](./../common/page-substrates/page0078.png)
64
PAVEL CABAN
CYIL 6 ȍ2015Ȏ
Conference).
8
The Review Conference applied article 121(5) also with regard to
the “Belgian” amendments to article 8 on war crimes, which were adopted at the
Review Conference together with the amendments on the crime of aggression.
9
Thus,
the amendments on the crime of aggression enter into force for each ratifying State
Party individually, one year after the deposit of relevant instrument of ratification or
acceptance with the depositary – the United Nations Secretary-General. The Czech
Republic deposited its instrument of acceptance of the aggression amendments as the
twenty-third State Party on 12 March 2015; the amendments will enter into force for
the Czech Republic on 12 March 2016.
2. Activation of the Court’s jurisdiction
However, the entry into force of the amendments on the crime of aggression
as such does not have any real legal effect; according to some authors, after the
entry into force of these amendments the States Parties are bound only by “sleeping
obligations”. The reason is the fact that, in addition to the entry into force, the
jurisdiction of the Court over the crime of aggression has to be
activated
by fulfilling
the additional conditions for the exercise of jurisdiction (
i.e.
not for the entry into
force), provided for in paragraphs 2 and 3 of the new articles 15bis (regulating
the exercise of jurisdiction over the crime of aggression in case of state referral and
proprio motu
investigation) and 15ter (regulating the exercise of jurisdiction based
on the United Nations Security Council referral) of the Rome Statute, adopted
at the Review Conference. According to one of the prominent participants of the
Review Conference, this special procedure for activating the Court’s jurisdiction
over the crime of aggression was adopted mainly in order to provide the Court with
“breathing room”,
i.e.
to enable the Court to prepare for this sensitive task, and to
take into account the fact that some delegations were reluctant to operationalize the
Court’s jurisdiction right away.
10
According to the activating conditions, the Court may exercise jurisdiction
(1) only with respect to crimes of aggression committed one year after the ratification
or acceptance of the amendments by thirty States Parties, and (2) subject to an
“activation” decision to be taken after 1 January 2017 by the same majority of States
Parties as is required for the adoption of an amendment to the Statute,
i.e.
two-thirds
of States Parties. In addition, the preamble of the resolution RC/Res.6 states that the
8
Resolution RC/Res.6, OP 1: “Decides to adopt, in accordance with article 5, paragraph 2, of the Rome
Statute of the International Criminal Court (hereinafter: “the Statute”) the amendments to the Statute
contained in annex I of the present resolution, which are subject to ratification or acceptance and shall
enter into force in accordance with article 121, paragraph 5; …”.
9
Resolution RC/Res.5, OP 1: “Decides to adopt the amendment to article 8, paragraph 2 (e), of the
Rome Statute … which is subject to ratification or acceptance and shall enter into force in accordance
with article 121, paragraph 5, of the Statute; …”.
10
Stefan Barriga,
op. cit.
sub 1, p. 37-38.