Previous Page  33 / 200 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 33 / 200 Next Page
Page Background

DECEMBER, 1936]

The Gazette of the Incorporated Law Society of Ireland.

29

hUadhaigh, 248 ;

William J. Norman, 239 ;

John R. Brennan, 238;

John J. Dunne,

223. And the following to form a supple–

mental list in case of vacancies : John J.

Dundon, 221 ;

Ivan Howe, 158 ; T. Desmond

McLoughlin, 151.

THE

PRESIDENT,

addressing

the

meeting, said :

Gentlemen Since I had the privilege of

addressing you in May last I regret to say

that we have lost many of our members by

death, and to their relatives we tender our

sincere sympathy.

I wish specially to refer

to the passing of Mr. Henry K. Toomey, of

Athy, a member of the Council from 1924

and Vice-President during the year 1928-29.

He was held in high regard by his colleagues

on the Council, where his long experience

coupled with an extensive knowledge of both

law and practice made him a most useful

member, while his unfailing courtesy and

geniality endeared him to all who knew him.

His death, like that of Mr. Philip O'Sullivan

earlier in the year, deprived the Council of

two valuable members whose death

is

sincerely mourned by their colleagues. To

the memory of both I wish to pay my personal

tribute, as I have the happiest recollections

of two men who adorned our profession and

whose friendship it was a privilege to enjoy.

The vacancies on the Council were filled by

Mr. Stapleton and Mr. Norman, who have

proved most valuable members.

The Annual Report which has been

circulated amongst the members and will be

submitted to you to-day, as is customary,

gives, such a full and detailed account of the

work of the Council for the past year that it

seems almost unnecessary for me to say much

in regard to it. There are, however, some

matters to which I may very briefly draw

your attention.

The number of our members remains

stationary, and it is rather remarkable to

find it is exactly similar to the number in the

previous year 786. When you find that

there are 1,316 Solicitors practising in the

Free State, it is at once apparent that there

are a large number who have so far failed

to join our Society. I dealt with this lack of

interest at the May meeting and do not

intend to do so again, beyond expressing the

hope that even yet those members of our

profession who hold aloof while participating

in all the benefits which this Society secures

for the profession as a whole, may come to

realise what I suggest is a very plain and

obvious duty.

The Courts of Justice Bill, 1934, has not

yet become law, but we are all glad to see

that within the last few days the Report

Stage has been taken up, and I have no

doubt that the Government, recognising the

urgency of many of the reforms which the

Bill will effect, will lose no time in putting

it on the Statute Book.

We still await the Rules of Court under the

Workmen's Compensation Act, 1934, and I

may remind you that so far back as last.

February we urged upon the Minister for

Justice the necessity for these Rules, and

were then informed that the work of drafting

them had been taken in hand by Counsel.

Truly, great bodies move slowly !

May I also

point out the delay in issuing the bound

volume of the Statutes. Those for 1933 were

not issued until July, 1935, and for the year

1934 tiU May, 1936 ;

while the volume for

1935 has not yet appeared.

I would direct attention

to

the new

regulation in the Land Registry in regard to

returnable documents

involving personal

attendance at the Central Office instead of

the hitherto existing practice whereby docu–

ments were returned by post. This change I

learned by a call on the courteous Chief

Registrar is in the interest of public economy,

but if a Solicitor wishes documents returned

as heretofore by post, he can have this done

by remitting the necessary postage. I would

also draw attention to the necessity, where

the original Land Certificate is lodged, of

stating explicitly in writing at the time of

lodgment to whom it is to be returned. The

Council has had evidence that the omission

of this precaution may give rise to serious

trouble.

As the result of correspondence between

the Attorney-General and the Council, the

procedure with regard to obtaining his fiat

and resultant dealings has been placed on a

much more satisfactory basis so far as our

profession is concerned, and I would like to

acknowledge the courtesy and consideration

of the then Attorney-General in dealing with

our representations on the matter.