Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  739 / 1424 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 739 / 1424 Next Page
Page Background

739

*31-7-1987, Auroville:

P.V stopped me on the road, to ask me to sign a petition drafted by those in

Auroville who do not accept any compromise with the SAS and thus feel

misrepresented by the proposal Al.B has made at the general meeting of yesterday.

I cannot attune to any of these games now; but I looked at the petition, and the

first sentence, stating the betrayal by the SAS of the basic, living principles of

Auroville, I could well accept and endorse; but this was followed by some dramatic

wording to the effect that to accept any compromise that would provide entry to

the SAS would deal “a fatal blow to our aspirations and hopes”; and it went on

requesting the continuation of the Government’s active protection… And this to me

is nonsense, and such a comedy! (If such are our “aspirations” that they can so

easily be killed, then they aren’t worth mentioning!) P.V wasn’t happy at my

abstaining!

***

*Open letter regarding the Organisation of Auroville and its relationship to

the Central Government of India.

(Note: I had written this document, it appears from the date, at the beginning of

1987, but I do not remember when it was shared with others in Auroville –

however, it remained actual…)

- 26.1.1987, Auroville -

“It seems we are being asked to come up with some practical, workable proposals

concerning the next few years of Auroville’s evolution.

It is understandable that the Government of India does not wish to remain

perpetually entangled with Auroville and that on the other hand, having committed

itself so concretely for several years, it cannot just pull out without certain

guarantees.

Auroville too does need guarantees that it will not have to return to the previous

sterile state of conflict with its would-be owners.

But it also needs to find its own ways to evolve, to discover them with the least

interference from any of the machineries that are based in the ordinary world and

society.

We chose to ask the Government’s help and, given the general conditions at

present, it appears that we still need that help for some time to come.

So perhaps, rather than making big declarations and taking foolish stands, or else

passively going under the crushing weight of inadequate and rigid organisational

formations, we could suggest some simple and effective means by which both the

Government and Auroville will feel their respective duties are un-compromised and

their respective responsibilities are clear.