Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  213 / 453 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 213 / 453 Next Page
Page Background

1

Evaluation of the

mericon®

E. coli O157 Screen Plus and

mericon

1

E. coli STEC O-Type Pathogen Detection AssaysinSelectFoods:

2

Collaborative Study

3

4

Patrick Bird, M. Joseph Benzinger, Jr., Benjamin Bastin, Erin Crowley, James Agin, and

5

David Goins

6

Q Laboratories, Inc., 1400 Harrison Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45214

7

8

Marcia Armstrong

9

QIAGEN, 19300 Germantown Rd., Germantown, MD 20874

10

11

Collaborators: D. Clark,M. Endres, K. Guden, L. Thompson, C. Liska, A. Sexton, E. Draper,

12

L. Arnts, H. Wright, A. Duss, A. Kim, S. Le, B. Kupski, U. Hariram, J. Franklin, J. Zheng,

13

K. Matheus, N. Kaur, A. Mastalerz, N. Klass

14

15

The QIAGEN

mericon

®

E. coliO157 Screen Plus and

mericon

E. coliSTEC O-Type

16

Pathogen Detection Assays employ Real-Time (RT) PCR technology

17

incorporating a HotStart Taq DNA Polymerase for the rapid, accurate detection of

18

Escherichia coli

O157 and the Big 6 (non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing

E. coli

19

(STEC)) from select food types. Using a paired study design, the

mericon

E.

20

coliO157 Screen Plus Pathogen Detection Assay and the

mericon

E. coliSTEC O-

21

Type Pathogen Detection Assay were compared to the United States Department

22

of Agriculture (USDA) Food Safety Inspection Service (FSIS) Microbiology

23

Laboratory Guidebook (MLG) Chapter 5.09

Detection, Isolation and Identification

24

of Escherichia coli O157:H7 from Meat Products and Carcass and Environmental

25

Sponges

for the detection of

E. coli

O157:H7 in raw ground beef (73% lean). Both

26

mericon

assays were evaluated using themanual and automated DNA extraction

27

method.Thirteen (13) technicians from5laboratories located within the continental

28

United Statesparticipated in the collaborative study. Three levels of

29

contamination were evaluated: an un-inoculated control level (0 colony forming

30

units (CFU)/test portion)

,

a low inoculum level (0.2-2 CFU/test portion) and a high

31

inoculum level (2-5 CFU/test portion).Statistical analysis was conducted

32

according to the Probability of Detection (POD) statistical model.Results obtained

33

for the low inoculum level test portions produced a dLPOD value with 95%

34

confidence intervalof 0.00, (-0.12, 0.12) for the

mericon

E. coliO157 Screen Plus

35

with manual and automated extraction and

mericon

E. coliSTEC O-Type with

36

manual extraction and -0.01, (-0.13, 0.10) for the

mericon

E. coliSTEC O-Type with

37

automated extraction. The dLPOD resultsindicate no statistically significant

38

difference between the candidate methods and reference method.

39

___________________________________________________________________________

40

41

Most

E. coli

bacteria are harmless; however, some produce a toxin (Shiga toxin) that can cause

42

serious illness, including hemolytic anemia or renal failure, and can sometimes lead to death.

43

Like generic

E. coli

, Shiga-toxigenic

Escherichia coli

(STEC) are Gram-negative, rod-shaped

44

bacteria that are characterized by the production of Shiga toxins (

stx1, stx 2

) and the virulence

45

OMAMAN-36 A : Collaborative Study Manuscript

For ERP Use Only

January 2017

AOAC Research Institute

Expert Review Pan l Use Only