Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  97 / 124 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 97 / 124 Next Page
Page Background

95

FROM PROHIBITION OF DISCRIMINATION

TO PROTECTION OF COLLECTIVE RIGHTS

The international protection of human rights did not evolve linearly in the last

century. Rather, it has made a curve: starting from the protection of collective rights

in the system established after the First World War it turned to individual rights and

prohibition of discrimination after the Second World War to finally return in part

to the recognition of collective rights in order to complete the individual rights in

certain cases when group interests are at stake. The present volume of

Human Rights

Studies

reflects this evolution and the inherent linkages between the prohibition of

discrimination, minority rights and collective rights of certain non-dominant groups.

In the first contribution,

Anti-discrimination law as a post-modern renaissance of legal

privileges

,

Petr Svoboda

analyses in general the trend of legal affirmative discrimination

with the aim to protect minorities in postmodern Western states since the end of the

1960s. The essence of affirmative discrimination consist in introduction of new legal

privileges. The author puts this trend in the contrast to the principles of equality of

all the citizens before the law and of the prohibition of legal privileges, as they were

promulgated during revolutions and brought into effect in modern democracies based

on the rule of law during the 19th a 20th century.

In the next chapter,

Equality and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of

Discrimination against Women

,

Stanislava Hýbnerová

deals with equality of women.

According to her, several phases can be discerned in the development of the concept

of equality for women, all of them being found in the Convention on the Elimination

of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) of 1979. The author

argues that some of these phases are conflicting and pose problems to interpretation

of relevant articles. As an example, she points out the major difficulties concerning

interpretation of Article 4 (1) due to internal tension between earlier conception of

formal equality that considers affirmative actions as temporary and exclusive and the

new conception promoting new and more dynamic understanding of equality which

requires qualitative-structural change. The author analyses the different conceptions of

equality with respect to actual meaning which can be given to Article 4 (1).

In the third contribution,

Prisoner Disenfranchisement as Form of Discrimination

,

Marek Antoš

deals with restrictions of right to vote guaranteed by the European

Convention of Human Rights. He demonstrates that although the original intention

of member states was not to include an individual right to vote in the Convention, the

European Court of Human Rights has established the right through its case-law and

significantly advanced the gradual trend of enfranchising groups traditionally excluded

from elections. Based on the most striking line of jurisprudence which concerns

prisoners’ voting the author argues, however, that the Court has partly stepped back

from this trend recently.