Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  486 / 822 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 486 / 822 Next Page
Page Background

ART

Eternal India

encyclopedia

It has been stated earlier that all the Hindu scripts presently in

use in India have been evolved from the Brahmi script of the time of

Ashoka

The history of these scripts that have taken their present forms

through various stages of development in different parts of the

country over a period of 2-3 centuries is quite interesting.

In North India, Kharoshthi and Brahmi scripts were employed

by the Kushanas after Ashoka. In the subsequent period even

though the Guptas, too, used the Brahmi script for their inscriptions,

marked differences began to appear in the writing of this script as

employed in the eastern, central and western regions of the empire.

The Gupta Brahmi script employed in the 4th-5th centuries under-

went certain changes and developed into what is known as the

Kutila or Siddhamatrika script which was used in the North Indian

inscriptions during the 6th-9th centuries. The Nagari script that

came into vogue in the north by the 9th century and the Sarada script

appearing in the inscriptions of Kashmir and Chamba region by the

same time are developed from the Kutila or Siddhamatrika script.

Current Kaithi, Mohajani, Rajasthani and Gujarati scripts devel-

oped from the Nagari script. Likewise, the present day Kashmiri,

Takari scripts and many letters of the Gurumukhi scripts developed

from the Sarada script. The old Bengali or the Gaudiya script which

is the source of the present day Bengali, Oriya and Maithili scripts

and the script used in the inscriptions of North-east India from the

10th century developed from a variety of the Nagari. script that was

in vogue in the east Indian province of Magadha.

The southern scripts are developed from the Southern Brahmi

script employed in the inscriptions of the western Kshatrapas and

Satavahanas and those engraved in the cave temples at Nasik,

Karle and other places. The script that came into vogue in the north-

western provinces of South India from the 5th century is called the

western variety of the Southern Brahmi. Similarly, the square-

shaped script employed in the central provinces of India from the

5th century is termed the Central Brahmi. Both of these scripts

appear in the inscriptions till the 8th century with regional variations

at times.

The script used in the present day Karnataka and Andhra

Pradesh from the 5th-6th centuries is called the Telugu-Kannada

script since it was in vogue in both the regions without differences.

It is only from the 15th -16th century that marked differences

appeared in the scripts of these two regions and the Telugu and

Kannada scripts attained their independent nomenclature.

The Tamil script was evolved from the Brahmi script of the

cave

inscriptions in Tamil Nadu and has assumed its present form

through various stages of development from the 6th-7th century.

The roundish script called 'Vatteluttu' that came into use in the

southernmost part of Tamil Nadu and Kerala from the 6th-7th cen-

tury fell into disuse after the 14th century. The present day Grantha

script is developed from the Pallava Grantha script which was used

in the Arcot, Salem, Tiruchirapalli, Madurai and Tirunelveli regions

from the 7th century. Since there are no letters in the Tamil script

for soft consonants and aspirates, soft consonant and aspirate

letters of the Grantha script were used to write the Sanskrit words

figuring in the texts of the Tamil inscriptions from the beginning.

In the Kerala province Tamil language and Tamil Vatteluttu and

Grantha scripts were generally used till the 14th century. The influ-

ence of the Malayalam language is noticed in the texts of the in-

scriptions from about the 13th century. Once the Vatteluttu script

became obsolete inscriptions engraved in the Malayalam script,

which is more or less a development from the Grantha script, begin

to appear. The Malayalam script has been used with slight changes

in some of the Kannada and Tulu inscriptions in the southern half of

the South Kanara District. This script is also called the Tulu script.

Lastly, the Nagari script that was employed by the Kannada

dynasties of the Rashtrakutas and the Chalukyas of Kalyani under-

went certain changes and came to be termed 'Nandi Nagari'. It was

in vogue during the Yadava-Vijayanagara period.

For the ancient and medieval periods of Indian history, the

study of inscriptions has a special importance, because it is during

this early period that India's more significant contributions to the

world culture were made. Of all the sources for the reconstruction of

early Indian history, epigraphic records are the most important, for

they provide material for the major part of what we know about the

achievements of the Indians of old.

The great importance of inscriptions lies in the fact that they

generally offer information about personages and events of Indian

history, about which nothing is known from any other source. In-

scriptions as a source of Indian history are important because their

authors in most cases described contemporary events. Of course,

for describing the events of the past they had to depend on recorded

or unrecorded tradition. From the early medieval period inscriptions

of the imperial families generally incorporated a historical account

of the particular dynasties from their foundation down to the date of

the records. Thus, for instance, the Aihole inscription of 634 A.D.

gives a fairly clear and trustworthy account of the rise and early

history of the Chalukyas of Badami covering a period of about one

century. Another important characteristic of inscriptions is that

their texts are generally free from variant readings as they were

not usually liable to modification like those of literary works which

were copied and recopied by people in later times. Therefore, even

casual references to historical events and personages found in

epigraphic records which are either dated or can be assigned to a

definite period on palaeographic grounds are considered more use-

ful than similar mention in literary works which are known from late

copies and whose date of composition is very often uncertain. Some

inscriptions are known to describe facts which could not have been

quite palatable to the patrons of the authors. Such inscriptions

become the most authentic records for the impartial and objective

information they furnish.

Although inscriptions have contributed largely to the recon-

struction of the history of ancient and medieval India, their evidence

is not free from defects. The authors of inscriptions always suf-

fered from a limitation of space and their treatment of history was

never elaborate. Full and satisfactory information regarding an

event or a personage is met with in inscriptions only rarely. In the

epigraphs, history is often shadowed by poetical, eulogistic and

conventional elements. As such only some of the inscriptions can

be regarded as truly historical documents. A large number of in-

scriptions of all ages and of all parts of the land are altogether

undated. In the absence of a date in a known era, an epigraph can

only be approximately referred to a period, but not to a definite date.

A number of chronological problems still remain unsolved owing to

this defect of epigraphic records. Fabricated genealogical accounts

appearing in inscriptions and eagerness of the authors of eulogies

to exaggerate the achievements of their patrons and to display their

skill in rhetoric rather than in the accuracy of their statements are

some other defects of the epigrapic records. Despite these defects,

inscriptions form the most important source for the reconstruction

of the ancient and medieval periods of Indian history.

(K.M.B.)