Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  78 / 88 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 78 / 88 Next Page
Page Background

ECONOMIC REPORT 2015

78

The Investment Allowance

Budget 2015 announced the introduction of a new

simplified investment incentive based on capital

expenditure incurred within a determined field area.

This new allowance replaces all the previous offshore

field allowances and works to reduce the marginal rate

of tax on a much broader range of investments across

the UKCS.

The allowance shelters a certain amount of income

(62.5 pence for every £1 invested) from the

(now reduced) SC – meaning that for a proportion of

production income generated by that field only RFCT is

due. Transitional rules are in place to ensure that the

value of the old field allowances is protected as long

as FDP approval is gained before the end of 2015

28

.

The Investment Allowance applies to all investment

expenditure incurred after 1 April 2015.

The benefits of this new approach (alongside the cluster

allowance for areas thought to contain high pressure

high temperature resources) are principally that of

simplification of the allowance regime and removal

of the distortionary effects of the old allowances that

incentivised some projects over others. Alongside

reductions in headline rates for SC and PRT, also

announced at Budget, the Investment Allowance aims

to more successfully attract capital to the UKCS, as is

necessary for a mature and high cost region.

The Balance of Taxes and Allowances

The oil and gas fiscal regime taxes profits at a minimum

rate of 30 per cent, which is considerably higher than

for companies in all other parts of the economy. The

Oil Allowance within the PRT regime and the Field

Investment Allowance for SC purposes only ever reduce

the tax burden from very high rates to ones that are

closer to, but still higher, than that for other companies.

Therefore, these allowances cannot be said to represent

a subsidy for the industry, as is sometimes claimed;

all they do is partially alleviate the higher than normal

tax burden.

Furthermore, companies that have integrated

businesses are subject to both the ring fence regime in

respect of their upstream oil and gas production and

the normal CT regime for their downstream refining and

marketing businesses. Companies cannot offset their

profits or losses between the two regimes to reduce

their overall tax liability, because upstream profits are

always taxed separately under the ring fence regime.

28

For the list of Field Allowances, see the

Economic Report 2014

at

www.oilandgasuk.co.uk/publicationssearch.cfm