Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  382 / 536 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 382 / 536 Next Page
Page Background

368

BIRUTĖ PRANEVIČIENĖ – VIOLETA VASILIAUSKIENĖK

CYIL 7 ȍ2016Ȏ

on its possible transboundary impact; the nature of the possible decision and

indication of a reasonable time span to provide an opinion on the proposed measure.

Furthermore, if the affected Party wishes to participate in the environmental impact

assessment procedure, the Party of origin has the duty to provide all the relevant

information and enter into consultations with the affected Party. The consultations

may relate to possible alternatives to the proposed activity, possible measures to

mitigate significant adverse transboundary impact and to monitor the effects of such

measures at the expense of the Party of origin, other forms of mutual assistance in

reducing any significant adverse transboundary impact and other measures related to

the proposed activity.

43

If the notification has not taken place, and the concerned state considers that

it could be affected by a significant adverse transboundary impact of the proposed

activity, and it was not notified by the state which is carrying out or planning to carry

out the activity listed in the Convention, that state may address the state carrying out

the planned activity and request information that would allow this state to evaluate

whether the project could cause a significant transboundary impact. If the states

cannot agree on the likelihood of the significant adverse transboundary impact,

their disagreement may be submitted to an inquiry commission in accordance with

the provisions of Appendix IV of the Convention to decide on the likelihood of

significant adverse transboundary impact, unless they agree on another method of

settling this question.

The Espoo Convention came into force in Belarus on 8 February 2006. Therefore

the state has willingly accepted international obligations and is therefore bound to

uphold them.

Activities that are considered as causing transboundary harm are listed in Appendix I

of the Espoo Convention, and this includes as well “Thermal power stations and

other combustion installations with a heat output of 300 megawatts or more and

nuclear power stations and other nuclear reactors (except research installations for

the production and conversion of fissionable and fertile materials, whose maximum

power does not exceed 1 kilowatt continuous thermal load).”

44

As for the NPP being built in Belarus, Ostrovets, each reactor will have the

reference unit power of 1109 megawatts.

45

Belarus is building two-reactor nuclear

power plants. The location, the Ostrovets site, is located approximately 25 kilometres

from the Lithuanian – Belarusian border. The site is located about 40 kilometres

from the capital of Lithuania, Vilnius, which has a population of over half a million.

Belarus informed the affected Parties about its planned activity on 15 July 2008, and

43

Ibid

., Article 5.

44

Ibid

., Appendix I, point 2.

45

IAEA, Power Reactor Information System ‘Republic of Belarus’ (IAEA, last update 30 May 2016)

<https://www.iaea.org/pris/CountryStatistics/CountryDetails.aspx?current=BY

> accessed 31 May 2016.