372
BIRUTĖ PRANEVIČIENĖ – VIOLETA VASILIAUSKIENĖK
CYIL 7 ȍ2016Ȏ
in paragraph 3 and include those cases where the public authority does not have the
information requested, where the request is formulated in a manner too general, or
if the matter concerns internal communications between public authorities. Further
grounds of refusal are set out in para. 4 of the above mentioned Article. If the state
refuses to submit the information requested, the refusal has to be in writing and has
to state the reasons for refusal.
Furthermore, Article 6 provides that during the environmental impact assessment
process the public should have access for examination “to all information relevant
to the decision-making referred to in [Article 6] that is available at the time of the
public participation procedure.” According to the Convention, States parties should
at least provide the following information:
“(a)A description of the site and the physical and technical characteristics of
the proposed activity, including an estimate of the expected residues and
emissions;
(b) A description of the significant effects of the proposed activity on the
environment;
(c) A description of the measures envisaged to prevent and/or reduce the effects,
including emissions;
(d) A non-technical summary of the above;
(e) An outline of the main alternatives studied by the applicant; and
(f ) In accordance with national legislation, the main reports and advice issued to
the public authority at the time when the public concerned shall be informed
in accordance with paragraph 2 above.”
In this particular case the important question is the subject who is entitled to
receive information. There are two different terms used in the text of the Convention
– ‘public’ and ‘public concerned’. In the first pillar – the right to seek and receive
information, any member of the ‘public’ may request information (the notion of ‘public’
will be discussed further). The novelty of the Aarhus Convention lies namely in this
particular feature that “any person” may apply for information to state authorities and
may receive it. ‘Any person’ means individual persons and legal persons, which may
also be associations, organisations and groups.
61
These are mentioned for emphasis,
and this is for the purpose that “associations, organizations or groups without
legal personality may also be considered to be members of the public under the
Convention.”
62
These notions are qualified by the reference to national legislation or
practice. Therefore, it can be stated that
ad hoc
formations can only be considered to
be members of the public where the requirements established by national legislation
61
Aarhus Convention Implementation Guide (supra n 31) 55.
62
Ibid
.