Previous Page  41 / 60 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 41 / 60 Next Page
Page Background

DAILY PRACTICE AREA UPDATES

The CBA is pleased to introduce the second year

of CBANewsstand by Lexology, a daily email that

provides valuable and free practical know-how.

Learnmore at

www.chicagobar.org/newsstand.

ment cases. Examples of what are referred

to as “first-party” negligent entrustment

cases from other jurisdictions are

Hays v.

Royer

, 384 S.W.3d 330 (2012) and

Martell

v. Driscoll

, 297 Kan. 524 (2013). In both

instances, the plaintiffs were first-parties

who were injured in accidents caused by

their

own

negligence after being entrusted

vehicles by the defendants,

Hays v. Royer

,

384 S.W.3d 330, 331 (2012) and

Martell

v. Driscoll

, 297 Kan. 524, 528 (2013).

Each court in those cases turned to

the Restatement (Second) of Torts § 390

to determine that first-party negligent

entrustment claims are viable under their

state laws. This section is an illustration of

a potential negligent entrustment scenario

and reads:

A rents his boat to B and C, who are

both obviously so intoxicated as to

make it likely that they will misman-

age the boat so as to capsize it or to

collide with other boats. B and C

by their drunken mismanagement

collide with the boat of D, upset-

ting both boats. B, C, and D are

drowned. A is subject to liability to

the estates of B, C, and D under the

death statute, although the estates of

B and C may be also liable for the

death of D.

Restatement (Second) of

Torts

§ 390 comment (c), Illustration

7 (1965).

From this illustration the courts deter-

mined that as long as a state’s contributory

negligence laws did not already block the

claim, an assertion of negligent entrust-

ment is valid against an entrustor,

Hays

,

384 S.W.3d at 338 and

Martell

, 297 Kan.

at 532. Once again, these are significant

decisions that further expand the factual

scenarios where negligent entrustment is

applicable.

Another example of the expanding trend

occurring in courts includes expansion

of what can be entrusted. Traditionally,

property included in negligent entrustment

cases has been limited to cars, various type

of guns, or other dangerous items. How-

ever, a recent case in Tennessee expanded

on these items. In

West v. East Tenn. Pioneer

Oil Co.

, 172 S.W.3d 545 (2005), the plain-

tiff alleged that the defendant, a gas station,

entrusted gasoline to a clearly intoxicated

individual, who was later involved in an

automobile accident,

West

, 172 S.W.3d

at 547 (2005). The plaintiffs asserted that

when the gas station sold and assisted the

intoxicated driver with pumping gas it

entrusted himwith it and that it was clearly

foreseeable that the gasoline would be used

in a manner that would place others in

danger.

The Tennessee Supreme Court agreed

with this claim and reversed the lower

courts’ decisions to grant summary judg-

ment, explaining that the plaintiffs estab-

lished a prima facie case for negligent

entrustment. This, like the previous cases,

is an expansion on property that is typically

included in negligent entrustment cases.

This expansion, once again, further high-

lights the pro-plaintiff shift in negligent

entrustment decisions. Overall, when

viewed as a whole, these cases clearly sig-

nify a definite trend. This means that more

courts are willing to, and should continue

to be willing to, allow plaintiffs injured

by negligently entrusted property to file

against the entrustor of that property.

Conclusion

Liability for negligent entrustment is

expanding as courts face more difficult

entrustment scenarios and lawyers seek to

apply the law to those cases. The public is

served well by this expansion as justice is

done for these victims.

G. Grant Dixon III is the founder of the

personal injury and worker’s compensation

law firm, Dixon Law Office, with offices in

LaGrange, Chicago and Oakbrook Terrace.

Grant would like to thank Ryan Liss for his

extensive research and writing contributions

to this article.

L AWY E R S ’ A S S I S TA N C E P R O G R A M

ANNUAL DINNER

NOVEMBER 3

RD

For more information contact LAP at

312-726-6607 or visit

www.illinoislap.org

.

JUDGE OF THE YEAR

Judge Robert J. Anderson, 18th Judicial Circuit Court

VOLUNTEERS OF THE YEAR

Robert Kelleher, Michelle Owen, Ruta Stropus

M I CHAEL J . HOWLETT JR . AWARD

Illinois Bar Foundation

EXECUT I VE D I RECTOR ’ S AWARD

Michael Cortina

CBA RECORD

41