Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  15 / 234 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 15 / 234 Next Page
Page Background

LINKING PEOPLE, JOINING NATIONS

International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), had already stressed in their World

Standards Day message that ‘…survival itself is at stake’. In stressing the importance of

their words the two Presidents signalled what the future was likely to be with respect to

standards and their involvement in changing minds and opinions. ‘Let us not forget that it

is technology which in the long run will give our children and their offspring a world fit to

live in … this technology is the heart of the world standardisation effort.’

7

IIW, inescapably,

was destined to be part of that effort also.

This theme was later to be reflected in the expected challenges of the 1990s when

trying to bring about environmentally sustainable growth in an economical and equitable

way. It was something that IIW had to be cognisant of, more so since other authorities, such

as the Union of International Technical Associations (UITA), were also applying pressure

by suggesting the adoption of a more environmentally friendly approach to their policies.

8

IIW was to take on such issues and garner a more serious attitude to social responsibility in

the new millennium.

In considerationof this, the relationshipwith ISOandother international

organisations was of extreme significance, particularly since IIWhad become

an international standardising body approved by ISO to develop standards

in the field of welding and related processes in 1986. There were ominous

signs that this relationship was starting to wear thin in the early 1990s due

to the fact that IIW did not fully appreciate the significance and value of

the approval it had received from ISO, or adhere fully to ISO practices and

documentation.

9

Additionally, it had no effective working system in place to

assist the standardisation process. The warning messages received from ISO

on IIW’s performance appeared to have gone unheeded at this time despite the

possibility of IIW losing its status with ISO.

10

There was much to do therefore,

in the 1990s, to improve the relationship with ISO and other standards

authorities such as the European Committee for Standardization (CEN).

Actions to improve these relationships were of great urgency and signified more than

anything the dichotomy that IIW now faced. It was producing work of great importance

from among its Commissions, however inertia in decision-making was impacting on its

relationships, both within and without the Institute, as an effective welding organisation. One

of the problems was the lack of standards writing knowledge within IIW and the difficulty in

complying with the exact ISO format. The IIW Scientific and Technical Secretariat provided

by the French Institut de Soudure and others within IIW worked to resolve these issues and

the Scientific and Technical Secretary, Mr Michel Bramat, was to report later that, as far as

relations between IIW, ISO and CEN were concerned, procedures to harmonise the working

programmes of these three organisations were now under development.

11