Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  17 / 234 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 17 / 234 Next Page
Page Background

LINKING PEOPLE, JOINING NATIONS

in these documents available to industry and the general public.

Modernisation was the key to upgrading IIW’s service to the

membership and, following its initial presentation to the Executive

Council, the WG

Strategic Planning

, under the guidance of the

Chair Dr Giulio Costa (Italy), was then given official approval to

provide a new-found platform to guide IIW through the 1990s. The

final report was delivered to the Executive Council in July 1992

after several meetings, the last being in Madrid, Spain, in

May 1992.

15

The report was comprehensive and covered

both the strengths and weaknesses of IIW and looked

at the ‘big picture’ opportunities rather than solving the

specific problems that IIW currently faced.

One of the strengths of the Institute was its high professional standing in government,

industry, research institute and university circles. The current structure of IIW was

considered to be a powerful administrative machine for communication between welding

societies and individual specialists of many disciplines on a worldwide basis. IIW did have

weaknesses, the most important of which had been evident for some years – the length of

time that it took for actions to be implemented.

One would suspect that such criticisms were aimed at the long-held

constitutional requirement, 44 years in fact, for the registered office to be

situated in the country where the General Secretary was based, at that time

the UK. It was commented that legal opinion, as defined by English Law,

meant that the Institute was an unincorporated company, a matter that would

not have sat well with some members of the Executive Council since it

meant that IIW had no legal status at all. The final conclusions of the report

did recommend a number of initiatives and a need for the Executive Council

to be restructured so that Vice-Presidents became responsible for specific

areas and operation of corresponding working groups.

During Eaton’s Presidency 1990-1993 the concept of a single

secretariat was progressively developed and received increasing

support by most members of the Executive Council. Mr Robert

Salkin (Belgium), who was President 1987-1990 was not, however,

in favour of a single secretariat although the incoming President in

1993, Mr Raül Timerman (Argentina), with an industrial background,

fully supported a single secretariat.

16

Following the release of the

findings of the WG

Strategic Planning

a total of 12 members

responded with suggestions. Inevitably, many were to question

the current practice of having both a General Secretariat in the

UK and a Scientific and Technical Secretariat in France.

Giulio Costa

Robert Salkin