Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  106 / 328 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 106 / 328 Next Page
Page Background

Primary and Secondary Evaluation of Method SJW-01

SJW-01:

Hypericumperforatum-Chemical Profling and Quantitative Results of St. John’s wort

Products by an Improved High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Method

Author(s):

M. Ganzera, J. Zhao, I.A. Khan, National Center for Natural Products Research, Research

Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi

38677, Department of Pharmacognosy, School of Pharmacy, The University of

Mississippi, University, Mississippi 38677

S

UMMARY OF

M

ETHOD

:

G

ENERAL

C

OMMENTS

:

The method is a fairly typical HPLC method used to quantify nine (9) main Hypericumperforatum

compounds in 35 minutes. The indicated compounds are hypericin, hyperforin, pseudohypericin, and six

(6) flavonoids: rutin, hyperoside, isoquercitrin, quercitrin, quercetin and 3, II8-Biapigenin. The identity

of each of the compounds was confirmed in an LC-MS experiment. The sample preparation for this

method involves methanol extraction (4 times), centrifugation and filtration.

P

ROS

/S

TRENGTHS

:

The method is simple and straightforward HPLC method and sample preparation. It was noted that the

manuscript has method validation data and the majority of well equipped analytical labs could run this

assay. The laboratory used five (5) commercially available standards and isolated three (3). At least two

of these standards, hypericin and hyperforin, are commercially available from Addipharma in Germany.

The I3, II8-biapigenin was quantified utilizing a relative response factor (according to literature and

relative to rutin).

C

ONS

/W

EAKNESSES

:

The manuscript does not contain detail regarding the types of samples tested (i.e., matrices not well

defined). The manuscript refers to commercial samples but does not give details of the type of samples.

EXPERT REVIEW PANEL VOTE

AND

RECOMMENDATION

MOTION:Not to make a decision on the method at this time pending review of the SLV data.

Roman, Brown (Unanimous) – Motion Passed

ERP PROFILE SUMMARIES

83