Previous Page  678 / 736 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 678 / 736 Next Page
Page Background

contractor may be inadequate and the contractor

may have to obtain further resources at short

notice and heavy expense, while if a quantity is

greatly reduced the payment received by the con

tractor may make uneconomic the use of the

plant and personnel engaged for the contract.

For example, where part of the works is the im

portation of stone and there is a limited amount

of stone available for purchase in the neighbour

hood of the works, how can the contractor fix

his price per ton for importation if the employer

(despite a long period of site investigation) can

not tell him whether or not the quantity of stone

to be imported will exceed the quantity available

in the neighbourhood?

How very foolish of contractors and engineers

to consider this a practical problem, when it can

be solved simply by sprinkling

the bill with

'provisional' items. How doubly foolish to wish

to hurry lawyers who have so much to offer,

making it necessary for the learned editor to

admonish them firmly:

".

.

.

even with punctilious, attention and

immediate

availability

of

all

concerned,

pleadings in a complicated building or engin

eering matter can rarely take less than twelve

to eighteen months, and frequently more than

that."

That the contractor may become bankrupt in

this period or the truth on which an employer may

rely to resist a false claim fade from mind is no

doubt immaterial—all problems can be solved by

words and the arguments of advocates.

The text of the book remains an invaluable aid

to the discerning practitioner who can separate

th wheat from the chaff. Any practitioner asked

to draft a construction contract

should

read

Chapter 15 especially, so as to be warned of the

traps which the House of Lords has recently laid

for the unwary.

MAX W. ABRAHAMSON.

Bankruptcy Law and Practice

by G. H. L.

Fridman, I. Hicks and E. C. Johnson, 8v., London,

Butterworth, 1970. £5.50.

In the preface to this work the authors state

that their chief aim is to provide a comprehensive

straightforward account of the law and practice

of bankruptcy. They have certainly succeeded.

The authors of course write for

the English

practitioner and their book states the law in that

country as it was on December 1st 1969. Bank

ruptcy law there, as here,

is

the creature of

statute and in England the effective bankruptcy

statute is the 1914 Act which has no application

in either jurisdiction in Ireland. The book is based

on this Act.

For the Irish bankruptcy practitioner who reads

the work with care and remembers the distinction

between the methods of Bankruptcy administra

tion in Ireland and England the book will be in

valuable. There is a vast mass of bankruptcy law

which is common to both countries and it is to

be found set out in this treatise in a cogent and

readable fashion. The authors in departing from

the traditional method of presentation of Bank

ruptcy

law used by

the

learned

authors of

Williams on Bankruptcy—the standard work—

and dealing with bankruptcy law in a logical form

rather than the method used

in Williams of

dealing with each section of the 1914 Act have

performed a useful service to the serious student

of this branch of the law.

They have also referred in detail to the findings

of the Blagden Committee which reported

in

1957. This was a Committee set up to enquire

into the law and administration of bankruptcy in

England and while its conclusions have not so

far been given legislative effect in that country

the findings of the Committee have been studied

with much interest by bankruptcy lawyers

in

Ireland.

There are few facets of bankruptcy law which

the Irish lawyer will not find dealt with by the

authors in a capable and thorough manner. Deal

ing with the auxiliary jurisdiction in bankruptcy

the Authors at page 304 state than an order of

an English Court with bankruptcy jurisdiction is

enforceable in Scotland and Northern Ireland in

Courts having bankruptcy jurisdiction there as if

made in such Courts. There is also, they state,

reciprocity with Orders of Courts of bankruptcy

in Scotland and Northern Ireland. While this is

of course true we trust that in future editions of

the work the Authors will note that the practice

218