Previous Page  705 / 736 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 705 / 736 Next Page
Page Background

(Ij That a territory is an area over which a con

tracting party exercised effective jurisdiction,

and that the Israeli Government exercised de

facto authority over Jerusalem, and

that,

therefore, Jerusalem was within the territory

of Israel.

(2) That in Habeas Corpus proceedings under

the Extradition Act which had previously

been before the magistrate, the Court would

not re-hear the case other than considering

whether there was a political issue involved.

(3) That

if additional evidence related to

the

character of the crimes charged, it would be

admissible.

(4) That in this case the appellant had merely

involved himself in a family quarrel, which

was not an offence of a political character.

There was also the case of the Polish seaman

who was granted asylum after jumping from

his ship in London Docks. The attempt to

leave Poland was deemed good on political

grounds.

The Irish Extradition Act was drafted on a

similar Convention of the Council of Europe;

the principles must depend on reasons set out in

the judgments. In the Bourke case, the Supreme

Court held on 31st July, 1970 that Bourke had

been involved in an offence (helping Blake to

escape) which was connected with a political

offence (espionage). This argument may possibly

allow ordinary criminals to escape surrender, and

it was also effective in the Magee case in the

Supreme Court (31st July, 1970), though not in

the recent Keane case in the House of Lords

where reasons have not yet been given.

Apart from political asylum, there remains the

question of

the right of a citizen to receive reason

able treatment in an alien country.

Under Article

19 of the European Social Charter, steps have

been taken between countries for the co-ordin

ation of relevant social services and for easing the

re-uniting of families. However, a dependant of a

British Asian or African subject would not appear

to be allowed to enter Britain if he has to undergo

intensive medical treatment.

There was also the recent case of a Portuguese

girl and her mother resident in Jersey. The girl

became pregnant and the authorities deported her

on moral grounds.

The

legal obligations of freedom of move

ment within

the European Community

in

clude an obligation to provide social security

for migrant workers and reasonable benefits; there

is no doubt that the social security standards are

infinitely higher on the Continent, and Britain

cannot even conform with the minimum standards

of social security laid down by the International

Labour Office.

To sum up, the idea of freedom of movement is

desirable but it is too much restricted by adminis

trative discretion, which gives administrators free

dom to evade the statutes. This discretion should

be exercised narrowly, and not widely; particularly

when there is in fact no control of aliens as be

tween here and Britain. It was amazing that a

Norwegian who escaped from custody in Dublin

airport, and was subsequently recaptured in a

hotel, was not given an opportunity to test whether

the Danish warrant under which he was held in

fact warranted extradition; this undesirable prac

tice should be discontinued. There was conse

quently a need for the codification of rules govern

ing freedom of movement, particularly in apply

ing the American principle of "due process" to it.

MINISTERIAL VIEWS ON

AUCTIONEERS'

FEES

IN CONFLICT

Two differing Ministerial views on the scale

of auctioneers' fees in this country were made

apparent in Dublin yesterday, when the Minister

for Labour, Mr. Brennan, told an auctioneers

gathering that he believed, under certain circum

stances, that the threatened reduction in fees was

unnecessary.

Mr. Brennan, who was addressing the inaugural

luncheon of the Irish Auctioneers' and Valuers'

Institute, in the Gresham Hotel, said that if real

estate agents in this country were to raise their

professional standards and provide as high a ser

vice as possible to their clients, then they would

fully prove their own argument that the present

fees structure would remain unchanged.

If they were willing to do this, he said, they

would "provide the best answer to arguments that

the fees should be reduced".

243

\